Literature DB >> 10411052

Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

W J Catalona1, G F Carvalhal, D E Mager, D S Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We update results in a series of consecutive patients treated with anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy regarding recovery of erections, urinary continence and postoperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One surgeon performed anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy on 1,870 men, using the nerve sparing modification when feasible. We evaluated recovery of erections and urinary continence in men followed for a minimum of 18 months. Patients who were not reliably potent before surgery, did not undergo a nerve sparing procedure, or received hormonal therapy or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy were excluded from the analysis of potency rates but not of continence rates. Other postoperative complications were evaluated for the entire patient population.
RESULTS: Recovery of erections occurred in 68% of preoperatively potent men treated with bilateral (543 of 798) and 47% treated with unilateral (28 of 60) nerve sparing surgery. Recovery of erections was more likely with bilateral than with unilateral nerve sparing surgery in patients less than 70 years old (71 versus 48%, p<0.001) compared with patients with age 70 years old or older (48 versus 40%, p = 0.6). Recovery of urinary continence occurred in 92% (1,223 of 1,325 men) and was associated with younger age (p<0.0001) but not with tumor stage (p = 0.2) or nerve sparing surgery (p = 0.3). Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of patients overall and were associated with older age (p<0.002) but the incidence declined significantly with increasing experience of the surgeon (p<0.0001). There was no operative mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy with the nerve sparing modification can be performed with favorable results in preserving potency and urinary continence. Better results are achieved in young men with organ confined cancer. Other complications can be reduced with increasing surgeon experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10411052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  113 in total

1.  Minimizing complications during retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is ureteral stenting necessary?

Authors:  B Schlenker; C Gratzke; M Seitz; P von Walter; D Tilki; O Reich; D Zaak; C G Stief; M J Bader
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)--technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Michael C Truss; Minh Do; Robert Rabenalt; Heidemarie Pfeiffer; Michael Dunzinger; Bernd Aedtner; Christian G Stief; Udo Jonas; Wolfgang Dorschner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  U Michl; M Graefen; J Noldus; T Eggert; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Odysseas Andrikopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Iason Kyriazis; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Fascia surrounding the prostate: clinical and anatomical basis of the nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Véronique Phé; Georges Fournier; Vincent Delmas; Philippe Sèbe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Haseebuddin; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

Review 9.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [New concept minimizes bleeding in radical retropubic prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Schostak; K Matischak; M Schäfer; M Müller; M Schrader; F Christoph; K Miller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.