Literature DB >> 14730441

Damage-based finite-element vertebroplasty simulations.

V Kosmopoulos1, T S Keller.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to quantify the efficacy of vertebroplasty according to: (1) damage and (2) cement quantity (fill) and modulus. Vertebral body damage was numerically simulated using a previously validated two-dimensional finite-element model coupled with an elasto-plastic modulus reduction (EPMR) scheme. The effects of cement fill (% marrow replaced by cement, % MRC) and cement modulus on vertebral apparent modulus and trabecular bone tissue stress concentrations were parametrically assessed for four EPMR damage models (19%, 33%, 60%, and 91% modulus reduction). For this analysis, the elastic modulus of the trabecular bone tissue and marrow elements were assumed to be 10 GPa and 10 kPa, respectively. The effect of cement modulus (varied in the range 1 GPa to 9 GPa) on vertebral apparent modulus was also examined for partial fill (39% MRC) and complete fill (100% MRC) using the 33% modulus reduction damage model. In the case of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA cement modulus = 2.16 GPa), restoration of the thoracic vertebral body (T10) apparent modulus to undamaged levels required 71% and 100% cement fill for the 19-33% and 60-91% modulus reduction damage models, respectively. Variations in cement modulus had no appreciable effect on the recovery of vertebral apparent modulus to undamaged levels for simulations of partial cement fill (39% MRC). For complete cement fill, however, a PMMA cement modulus produced approximately a 2-fold increase (82%) in vertebral apparent modulus relative to the undamaged vertebral body. Increasing the cement modulus to 9 GPa increased the vertebral apparent modulus over 2.5-fold (158%) relative to the undamaged state. The EPMR damage scheme and repair simulations performed in this study will help clinicians and cement manufacturers to improve vertebroplasty procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14730441      PMCID: PMC3476661          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0651-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Height change caused by creep in intervertebral discs: a sagittal plane model.

Authors:  T S Keller; M Nathan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-08

2.  Geometric and material property study of the human lumbar spine using the finite element method.

Authors:  W Suwito; T S Keller; P K Basu; A M Weisberger; A M Strauss; D M Spengler
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-03

3.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Mechanical behavior of damaged trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; X E Guo; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.

Authors:  T S Keller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  F Grados; C Depriester; G Cayrolle; N Hardy; H Deramond; P Fardellone
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; E M Erbe; D C Fenton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  A G Tohmeh; J M Mathis; D C Fenton; A M Levine; S M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of open-cell foam synthetic thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  Amy E Johnson; Tony S Keller
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Xianping Du; Lihua Huang; Jinsong Li; Ruisen Zhan; Weiguo Wang; Biaoxiang Xu; Song Wu; Cheng Peng; Shijie Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Investigating sacroplasty: technical considerations and finite element analysis of polymethylmethacrylate infusion into cadaveric sacrum.

Authors:  C T Whitlow; S K Yazdani; M L Reedy; S E Kaminsky; J L Berry; P P Morris
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Early stage disc degeneration does not have an appreciable affect on stiffness and load transfer following vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Tony S Keller; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical assessment of new surgical method instead of kyphoplasty to improve the mechanical behavior of the vertebra: Micro finite element study.

Authors:  Seyed Aref Hosseini Faradonbeh; Nima Jamshidi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-11-18

Review 7.  Computational modelling of bone augmentation in the spine.

Authors:  Sandro D Badilatti; Gisela A Kuhn; Stephen J Ferguson; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.