Literature DB >> 10488505

Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.

A G Tohmeh1, J M Mathis, D C Fenton, A M Levine, S M Belkoff.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cadaveric study on the biomechanics of osteoporotic vertebral bodies augmented and not augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and 1) not augmented, 2) augmented with unipedicular injection of cement, or 3) augmented with bipedicular injection of cement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a relatively new method of managing osteoporotic compression fractures, but it lacks biomechanical confirmation.
METHODS: Fresh vertebral bodies (L2-L5) were harvested from 10 osteoporotic spines (T scores range, -3.7 to -8.8) and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine intact strength and stiffness. They were then repaired using a transpedicular injection of cement (unipedicular or bipedicular), or they were unaugmented and recrushed.
RESULTS: Results suggest that unipedicular and bipedicular cement injection restored vertebral body stiffness to intact values, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly more compliant than either injected or intact vertebral bodies. Vertebral bodies injected with cement (both bipedicular and unipedicular) were significantly stronger than the intact vertebral bodies, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly weaker. There was no significant difference in loss in vertebral body height between any of the augmentation groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that unipedicular and bipedicular injection of cement, as used during percutaneous vertebroplasty, increases acute strength and restores stiffness of vertebral bodies with compression fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10488505     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  59 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  J M Mathis; J D Barr; S M Belkoff; M S Barr; M E Jensen; H Deramond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Retrospective review of procedural parameters and outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in 673 patients.

Authors:  Benny S Kim; Barbara Hum; Jung Cheol Park; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 4.  [Complications of vertebroplasty].

Authors:  M A Rauschmann; D von Stechow; K-D Thomann; D Scale
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Stress levels in bones and bone cement in the thoracolumbar spine afer kyphoplasty. Finite element study].

Authors:  L M Villarraga Ph D; P A Cripton; A J Bellezza; U Berlemann; S M Kurtz; A A Edidin
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.

Authors:  John M Mathis; A Orlando Ortiz; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  The retrial of percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Han Woong Kim; Austin Kwon; Min Cheol Lee; Jae Wook Song; Sang Kyu Kim; In Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-04-30

9.  A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.

Authors:  X S Zhu; Z M Zhang; H Q Mao; D C Geng; J Zou; G L Wang; Z G Zhang; J H Wang; L Chen; H L Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  [Vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression].

Authors:  R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; B B Ertl-Wagner; A Wallnöfer; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.