Literature DB >> 29806053

Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling.

Yi Peng1, Xianping Du2, Lihua Huang3, Jinsong Li1, Ruisen Zhan1, Weiguo Wang1, Biaoxiang Xu4, Song Wu5, Cheng Peng6, Shijie Chen7.   

Abstract

Vertebroplasty is a common and effective treatment for symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. However, the cemented and adjacent vertebras have a risk of recollapse due to largely unassured mechanisms, among which excessive stiffness of bone cement may be an important risk factor. This study aimed to find the most appropriate range of bone cement stiffness by analyzing its biomechanical effects on the augmented and adjacent vertebras of individual patient after vertebroplasty. A three-dimensional finite element model of T11-L1 osteoligamentous vertebras was reconstructed according to individual computed tomography data and validated by post mortem human subject experiment in literatures. Bone cement of varying stiffness was injected into the trabecular core of the T12 vertebra simulatively. The maximum von Mises stresses on cancellous and cortical bones of T11-L1 vertebras were analyzed under the loading conditions of flexion, extension, bending, and torsion. For the adjacent T11 and L1 vertebras, the stepwise elevation of the bone cement elastic modulus increased the maximum von Mises stress on the cancellous bone, but its effect on cortical bone was negligible. For the augmented T12 vertebra, the stresses on cancellous bone increased slightly under the loading condition of lateral bending and remained no impact on cortical bone. The linear interpolation revealed that the most suitable range of cement elastic modulus is 833.1 and 1408.1 Mpa for this patient. Increased elastic modulus of bone cement may lead to a growing risk of recollapse for the cemented vertebra as well as the adjacent vertebras. Our study provides a fresh perspective in clinical optimization of individual therapy in vertebroplasty. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cement; Elastic modulus; Finite element analysis; Osteoporotic fracture; Vertebroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29806053     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  64 in total

1.  Risk factors predicting the new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Young-Joon Rho; Woo Jin Choe; Young Il Chun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The influence of material property and morphological parameters on specimen-specific finite element models of porcine vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effect of bilateral facetectomy of thoracolumbar spine T11-L1 on spinal stability.

Authors:  Tian-Xia Qiu; Ee-Chon Teo; Qing-Hang Zhang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  An overview of clinical guidelines for the management of vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patrícia C S Parreira; Chris G Maher; Rodrigo Z Megale; Lyn March; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Reduction of cement leakage by sequential PMMA application in a vertebroplasty model.

Authors:  Sven Hoppe; Sebastian Wangler; Emin Aghayev; Benjamin Gantenbein; Andreas Boger; Lorin M Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Prospective clinical follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Maurits H J Voormolen; Paul N Lohle; Leo E Lampmann; Wilco van den Wildenberg; Job R Juttmann; Carel H Diekerhof; Jan de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Risk factors affecting progressive collapse of acute osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  K Y Ha; Y H Kim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Non-surgical management of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A review.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Vivek Dixit; Sahil Batra; Rajesh Malhotra; Alok Sharan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-02-07

9.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  The effects of person-centered or other supportive interventions in older women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H K Svensson; L-E Olsson; T Hansson; J Karlsson; E Hansson-Olofsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Three-Dimensional Cement Quantification Method for Decision Prediction of Vertebral Recompression after Vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Yanming Zhang; Tao Zhang; Xiang Ge; Yong Ma; Zhenduo Cui; Shuilin Wu; Yanqin Liang; Shengli Zhu; Zhaoyang Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  A finite element analysis on different bone cement forms and injection volumes injected into lumbar vertebral body in percutaneous kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Xun Zhang; Tiantian Chen; Fanchao Meng; Shiwen Li; Gongping Xu; Jinglong Yan; Wei Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  A digital twin for simulating the vertebroplasty procedure and its impact on mechanical stability of vertebra in cancer patients.

Authors:  Hossein Ahmadian; Prasath Mageswaran; Benjamin A Walter; Dukagjin M Blakaj; Eric C Bourekas; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras; Soheil Soghrati
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.648

4.  Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Haowen Dai; Yang Liu; Qing Han; Aobo Zhang; Hao Chen; Yang Qu; Jincheng Wang; Jianwu Zhao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study.

Authors:  Quan-Kun Zhou; Fan-Hui Zeng; Jian-Long Tu; Zhang-Qing Dong; Zhi-Hui Ding
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Bioactive poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Jinjin Zhu; Shuhui Yang; Kaiwen Cai; Shuo Wang; Zhiye Qiu; Junfei Huang; Guoqiang Jiang; Xiumei Wang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement composited with mineralized collagen for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in extremely old patients.

Authors:  Kefeng Luo; Guoqiang Jiang; Jinjin Zhu; Bin Lu; Jiye Lu; Kai Zhang; Xiumei Wang; Fu-Zhai Cui
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2020-01-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.