Literature DB >> 16896638

[Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

K Bohndorf1, R Fessl.   

Abstract

Cementoplasty, performed either as percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, has become well established as an effective technique to treat painful vertebral body fractures. It has low complication rates, is successful in alleviating pain, and improves the patients' mobility and quality of life. A series of questions remain open though or are the subject of controversial debate; for example, the results of several biomechanical studies are in part contradictory. Clinical data on subsequent fractures are also still inadequate, although the majority of studies show no elevated rate of subsequent fractures following treatment with cementoplasty in comparison to the natural course in patients with osteoporotic fractures. Kyphoplasty has the advantage of being able to restore the vertebral body height or reduce the kyphosis angle without leading to different clinical outcomes in comparison to vertebroplasty. Biomechanical considerations on whether restoration of the vertebral body's normal shape could reduce the rate of subsequent fractures still need scientific substantiation. Both surgical methods are employed in our clinic. Kyphoplasty seems to us to be indicated when the height of the anterior portion of the vertebral body is reduced by one-third compared to the norm or a kyphosis angle of more than 15-20 degrees is present. The goals of therapy are restoring the shape and reducing the kyphosis angle. This can only succeed, however, in fractures that are not older than 3 weeks. In all other cases vertebroplasty is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896638     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-006-1391-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  74 in total

1.  Unilateral transpedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty: initial experience.

Authors:  Ann K Kim; Mary E Jensen; Jacques E Dion; Patricia A Schweickert; Timothy J Kaufmann; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Biomechanical explanation of adjacent fractures following vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Gamal Baroud; Paul Heini; James Nemes; Marc Bohner; Stephen Ferguson; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; D C Fenton; R M Scribner; M E Reiley; K Talmadge
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Biomechanical impact of vertebroplasty. Postoperative biomechanics of vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Gamal Baroud; Marc Bohner
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  [Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition. 2: Operation and roentgenologic findings].

Authors:  C Knop; M Blauth; V Bühren; P M Hax; L Kinzl; W Mutschler; A Pommer; C Ulrich; S Wagner; A Weckbach; A Wentzensen; O Wörsdörfer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques.

Authors:  Dheera Ananthakrishnan; Sigurd Berven; Vedat Deviren; Kevin Cheng; Jeffrey C Lotz; Zheng Xu; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Radiological follow-up of new compression fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Noboru Tanigawa; Atsushi Komemushi; Shuji Kariya; Hiroyuki Kojima; Yuzo Shomura; Satoshi Sawada
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Introduction to the topic: diagnosis of osteoporosis - a paradigm shift].

Authors:  T M Link; H Imhof
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic spine fractures. Experience in over 500 patients].

Authors:  A Prokop; C Koukal; R Dolezych; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  [Kyphoplasty in osteoporotic spinal fractures].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Löhlein; M Chmilniecki; J Volbracht; M Manner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review].

Authors:  R Felder-Puig; B Piso; B Guba; G Gartlehner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.