Literature DB >> 19034533

Early stage disc degeneration does not have an appreciable affect on stiffness and load transfer following vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Victor Kosmopoulos1, Tony S Keller, Constantin Schizas.   

Abstract

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been reported to alter the mechanical behavior of the treated and adjacent-level segments, and have been suggested to increase the risk for adjacent-level fractures. The intervertebral disc (IVD) plays an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral motion segments. Comparisons between normal and degenerative IVD motion segments following cement augmentation have yet to be reported. A microstructural finite element model of a degenerative IVD motion segment was constructed from micro-CT images. Microdamage within the vertebral body trabecular structure was used to simulate a slightly (I = 83.5% of intact stiffness), moderately (II = 57.8% of intact stiffness), and severely (III = 16.0% of intact stiffness) damaged motion segment. Six variable geometry single-segment cement repair strategies (models A-F) were studied at each damage level (I-III). IVD and bone stresses, and motion segment stiffness, were compared with the intact and baseline damage models (untreated), as well as, previous findings using normal IVD models with the same repair strategies. Overall, small differences were observed in motion segment stiffness and average stresses between the degenerative and normal disc repair models. We did however observe a reduction in endplate bulge and a redistribution in the microstructural tissue level stresses across both endplates and in the treated segment following early stage IVD degeneration. The cement augmentation strategy placing bone cement along the periphery of the vertebra (model E) proved to be the most advantageous in treating the degenerative IVD models by showing larger reductions in the average bone stresses (vertebral and endplate) as compared to the normal IVD models. Furthermore, only this repair strategy, and the complete cement fill strategy (model F), were able to restore the slightly damaged (I) motion segment stiffness above pre-damaged (intact) levels. Early stage IVD degeneration does not have an appreciable effect in motion segment stiffness and average stresses in the treated and adjacent-level segments following vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Placing bone cement in the periphery of the damaged vertebra in a degenerative IVD motion segment, minimizes load transfer, and may reduce the likelihood of adjacent-level fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034533      PMCID: PMC2615121          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0828-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Intraoperative measurement of lumbar spine motion segment stiffness.

Authors:  Mark D Brown; David C Holmes; Anneliese D Heiner; Kathleen F Wehman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Measurement of cadaver lumbar spine motion segment stiffness.

Authors:  Mark D Brown; David C Holmes; Anneliese D Heiner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M A Liebschner; W S Rosenberg; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  S R Garfin; H A Yuan; M A Reiley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  I H Lieberman; S Dudeney; M K Reinhardt; G Bell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture.

Authors:  Seiji Tomita; Akihiro Kin; Masaya Yazu; Muneaki Abe
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Predicting trabecular bone microdamage initiation and accumulation using a non-linear perfect damage model.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Tony S Keller
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Balloon kyphoplasty: one-year outcomes in vertebral body height restoration, chronic pain, and activity levels.

Authors:  Jon T Ledlie; Mark Renfro
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  U Berlemann; S J Ferguson; L P Nolte; P F Heini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07

10.  An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; F Todd Wetzel; Isadore Lieberman; Marrion Campbell-Hupp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Matthew McDonnell; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanical assessment of new surgical method instead of kyphoplasty to improve the mechanical behavior of the vertebra: Micro finite element study.

Authors:  Seyed Aref Hosseini Faradonbeh; Nima Jamshidi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-11-18

3.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) utilizing a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Computational modelling of bone augmentation in the spine.

Authors:  Sandro D Badilatti; Gisela A Kuhn; Stephen J Ferguson; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.