Literature DB >> 14727012

Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women.

J Huopio1, H Kröger, R Honkanen, J Jurvelin, S Saarikoski, E Alhava.   

Abstract

Low calcaneal ultrasound measurement (quantitative ultrasound, QUS) has been shown to predict fractures in elderly women. However, only a few studies have examined its ability to predict perimenopausal and early postmenopausal fractures. We conducted a prospective population-based cohort study to assess the capability of QUS as compared to axial BMD measurement to predict early postmenopausal fractures at that age. Four hundred and twenty-two women (mean age 59.6, range 53.7-65.3) from the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE) were randomly chosen to undergo a calcaneal ultrasound measurement. In all, 9.4% of these women were premenopausal at the time of measurement. Thirty-two follow-up fractures were reported during the mean follow-up of 2.6 years (SD 0.7). These were validated with patient record perusal. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and stiffness index (SI) were significantly lower among women with than without fracture ( P-values 0.028, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Mean T-score adapted from SI was -1.5 (95% CI -1.7 to -1.2) for fracture group and -1.0 (95% CI -1.1 to -0.9) for the non-fracture group. All QUS measurements predicted fractures even after adjusting for age, weight, height, previous fracture history, femoral neck BMD and use of hormone replacement therapy according to Cox regression. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR, 95% confidence interval) of a follow-up fracture for a 1 SD decrease were 1.80 (1.27-2.56), 1.72 (1.21-2.45) and 1.43 (1.01-2.03) for SOS, SI and BUA, respectively. Similarly, the adjusted HR for a 1 SD decrease of spinal BMD was 1.27 (0.85-1.94) and for that of femoral neck BMD 1.14 (0.78-1.70). In receiver operator analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) was greatest for QUS measurements: SOS (AUC=0.68), stiffness (AUC=0.67), BUA (AUC=0.62) and least for lumbar BMD (AUC=0.56), while and femoral neck BMD (AUC=0.59). The difference between AUCs was statistically significant between SI and lumbar BMD ( P=0.02, Duncan's P=0.07). We conclude that low calcaneal QUS predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as or even better than axial BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14727012     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1534-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people.

Authors:  S M Pluijm; W C Graafmans; L M Bouter; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus reflects the mechanical properties of calcaneal trabecular bone.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; S E Radloff
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.

Authors:  C F Njeh; D Hans; J Li; B Fan; T Fuerst; Y Q He; E Tsuda-Futami; Y Lu; C Y Wu; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; N Malavolta
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prediction of fracture risk using axial bone mineral density in a perimenopausal population: a prospective study.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Huopio; R Honkanen; M Tuppurainen; E Puntila; E Alhava; S Saarikoski
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis?

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Christopher F Njeh; Larry G Jankowski; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use?

Authors:  G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  36 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound in relation to risk factors for low bone mineral density in South African pre-menopausal women.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Lynn Rosenberg; Yuqing Zhang; Diane Cooper; Asgar A Kalla; Lisa Micklesfield; Margaret Hoffman
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Association of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms and lifestyle factors with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and osteoporosis in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Tran Quang Binh; Toshikatsu Shinka; Nguyen Cong Khan; Vu Thi Thu Hien; Nguyen Thi Lam; Le Bach Mai; Takuro Nakano; Masako Sei; Shigeru Yamamoto; Masayo Nakamori; Yutaka Nakahori
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  The dependencies of phase velocity and dispersion on trabecular thickness and spacing in trabecular bone-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come".

Authors:  Robert S Siffert; Jonathan J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The dependence of time-domain speed-of-sound measurements on center frequency, bandwidth, and transit-time marker in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Christian C Anderson; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Bone turnover markers are correlated with quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: 5-year longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Lenora; P Gerdhem; K J Obrant; K K Ivaska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.