Literature DB >> 20234859

Quantitative ultrasound in relation to risk factors for low bone mineral density in South African pre-menopausal women.

Deborah Constant, Lynn Rosenberg, Yuqing Zhang, Diane Cooper, Asgar A Kalla, Lisa Micklesfield, Margaret Hoffman.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The study describes the association between risk factors and quantitative ultrasound bone measures in black and mixed-race pre-menopausal South African women. Despite some differences between the two study groups, the findings generally lend support to the use of ultrasound for epidemiological studies of bone mass in resource-limited settings.
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative ultrasound at the calcaneus is a convenient and inexpensive method of estimating bone strength well suited to community-based research in countries with limited resources. This study determines, in a large sample of pre-menopausal South African women, whether characteristics associated with quantitative ultrasound measures are similar to those shown to be associated with bone mineral density as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 3,493 women (1,598 black and 1,895 mixed race), aged 18-44 living in Cape Town. Study nurses administered structured interviews on reproductive history, lifestyle factors, and measured height and weight. Calcaneus quantitative ultrasound measurements were obtained using the Sahara device. Adjusted means of ultrasound measures according to categories of risk factors were obtained using multivariable regression analysis.
RESULTS: Associations between quantitative ultrasound measures and age, body mass index, age at menarche, parity, and primary school physical activity were similar to those known for bone mineral density as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. There were no clear associations between quantitative ultrasound measures and educational level, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and current calcium intake.
CONCLUSION: The data give qualified support to the use of quantitative ultrasound as an epidemiological tool in large studies of bone strength in pre-menopausal women.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20234859      PMCID: PMC2836751          DOI: 10.1007/s11657-009-0029-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  42 in total

1.  Bone properties as estimated by mineral density, ultrasound attenuation, and velocity.

Authors:  J Töyräs; H Kröger; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Cetin; H Ertürk; R Celiker; A Sivri; Z Hasçelik
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Precision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; M L Bouxsein; M E Melton; A H Kolodny; J H Clair; P T Delucca; M Stek; K G Faulkner; E S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Comparison of quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges with conventional bone densitometry in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Peter Alexandersen; Francesca de Terlizzi; Laszló B Tankó; Yu Z Bagger; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Mahmoud I El-Desouki; Mohammad S Sherafzal; Saleh A Othman
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Differences in bone size and bone mass between black and white 10-year-old South African children.

Authors:  L Vidulich; S A Norris; N Cameron; J M Pettifor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Relationship between risk factors and QUS in a European Population: The OPUS study.

Authors:  A Stewart; D Felsenberg; R Eastell; C Roux; C C Glüer; D M Reid
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Lifestyle questionnaire to evaluate risk for reduced bone mineral density in women.

Authors:  L K Micklesfield; L van der Merwe; E V Lambert
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; J Jurvelin; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Bone densitometry in premenopausal women: synthesis and review.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Zeba Syed
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reduced quantitative ultrasound bone mineral density in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy in Senegal.

Authors:  Amandine Cournil; Sabrina Eymard-Duvernay; Assane Diouf; Claire Moquet; Julie Coutherut; Ndèye Fatou Ngom Gueye; Cécile Cames; Bernard Taverne; Kirsten Bork; Papa Salif Sow; Eric Delaporte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Usefulness of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound stiffness for the evaluation of bone health in HIV-1-infected subjects: comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Alessandra Fantauzzi; Marco Floridia; Fabrizio Ceci; Francesco Cacciatore; Vincenzo Vullo; Ivano Mezzaroma
Journal:  HIV AIDS (Auckl)       Date:  2016-05-31

3.  Factors Associated with Bone Health in Malaysian Middle-Aged and Elderly Women Assessed via Quantitative Ultrasound.

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Nie Yen Low; Wan Ilma Dewiputri; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwanaa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.