Literature DB >> 17718324

The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.

Keith A Wear1.   

Abstract

Broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) is a clinically-accepted measurement for prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk. Typical clinical BUA measurements are performed with phase-sensitive receivers and, therefore, can be affected by phase cancellation. In order to separate the effects of conventional attenuation (absorption plus scattering) from phase cancellation, BUA was measured on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators and on 73 women using both phase sensitive (PS) and phase insensitive (PI) reception. A clinical bone sonometer with a two-dimensional (2-D) receiver array was used. PI BUA measurements on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators were found to be far more resistant to phase cancellation than PS BUA measurements. In data from 73 women, means and standard deviations for BUA measurements were 81.4 +/- 21.4 dB/MHz (PS) and 67.2 +/- 9.7 dB/MHz (PI). The magnitude of the discrepancy between PS BUA and PI BUA tended to increase with bone mineral density (BMD).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17718324      PMCID: PMC6935505          DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2007.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  49 in total

1.  Ultrasound velocity and attenuation in cancellous bone samples from lumbar vertebra and calcaneus.

Authors:  H Trebacz; A Natali
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Ethel S Siris; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kenneth G Faulkner; Lois E Wehren; Thomas A Abbott; Ya-Ting Chen; Marc L Berger; Arthur C Santora; Louis M Sherwood
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come".

Authors:  Robert S Siffert; Jonathan J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  S Maggi; M Noale; S Giannini; S Adami; D Defeo; G Isaia; L Sinigaglia; P Filipponi; G Crepaldi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.

Authors:  C M Langton; D K Langton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; A M Schott; J L Sebert; C Cormier; P O Kotzki; P D Delmas; J M Pouilles; G Breart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D C Bauer; C C Glüer; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; K E Ensrud; H K Genant; D M Black
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-24

9.  Quantitative heel ultrasound in 3180 women between 45 and 75 years of age: compliance, normal ranges and relationship to fracture history.

Authors:  P Thompson; J Taylor; A Fisher; R Oliver
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; F Duboeuf; C Durosier; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  13 in total

1.  Determining attenuation properties of interfering fast and slow ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone.

Authors:  Amber M Nelson; Joseph J Hoffman; Christian C Anderson; Mark R Holland; Yoshiki Nagatani; Katsunori Mizuno; Mami Matsukawa; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory.

Authors:  Christian C Anderson; Adam Q Bauer; Mark R Holland; Michal Pakula; Pascal Laugier; G Larry Bretthorst; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Conventional, Bayesian, and Modified Prony's methods for characterizing fast and slow waves in equine cancellous bone.

Authors:  Amber M Groopman; Jonathan I Katz; Mark R Holland; Fuminori Fujita; Mami Matsukawa; Katsunori Mizuno; Keith A Wear; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Characterization of the trabecular bone structure using frequency modulated ultrasound pulse.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yi Xia; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Christian C Anderson; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Negative dispersion in bone: the role of interference in measurements of the apparent phase velocity of two temporally overlapping signals.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Karen R Marutyan; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Fast and slow wave detection in bovine cancellous bone in vitro using bandlimited deconvolution and Prony's method.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yoshiki Nagatani; Katsunori Mizuno; Mami Matsukawa
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Time-domain separation of interfering waves in cancellous bone using bandlimited deconvolution: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.