Literature DB >> 10982168

Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study.

S Gnudi1, C Ripamonti, N Malavolta.   

Abstract

The ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to estimate the risk of osteoporotic fractures was evaluated in a prospective study over a mean time of 5.47 years in 254 postmenopausal women (mean age 58.06+/-7.67 years). Baseline measurements of ultrasound transmission velocity (UTV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were taken at the distal radius (DR). UTV was also measured at the patella (P). Fifty nonspine fractures due to minor trauma were detected during annual check-ups with an incidence of 3.59/year. Fractures occurred in older women with a lower BMD and QUS. Using Cox regression analysis the relative risk (RR) per 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease in the unadjusted QUS and BMD measurements was: BMD-DR = 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-8.09; 95% CI 2.08-9.68. The relationship between BMD and QUS variables and fracture risk persisted after adjusting for potential confounders apart from previous fractures, giving the following RR: BMD-DR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.06-8.41; UTV-DR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.18-11.49; UTV-P = 3.89, 95% CI 1.53-9.90. Correcting also for previous fractures, only UTV-P remained an effective predictor of fracture risk even after QUS measurement correction for BMD. Wrist fractures were best related to BMD-DR (RR 7.33, 95% CI 1.43-37.50) and UTV-DR (RR 10.94, 95% CI 1.10-108.45), while hip and ankle fractures were significantly associated only with UTV-P (hip: RR 32.14, 95% CI 1.83-562.80; ankle: RR 17.60, 95% CI 1.78-173.79). The combined use of BMD and QUS is a better predictor of fracture risk than either technique used separately. Comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves did not show differences in the ability of BMD and QUS to correctly distinguish fractures. In conclusion, QUS predicts fracture risk in osteoporotic women at least as well as BMD. UTV-DR and BMD-DR are good predictors of wrist fractures, while UTV-P is strongly related to hip and ankle fractures. QUS and BMD combined improve the diagnostic ability of each technique individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982168     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  6 in total

1.  Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; V Kuhn; E M Lochmüller; H Well; M Priemel; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Is ankle fracture related to low bone mineral density and subsequent fracture? A systematic review.

Authors:  Atiporn Therdyothin; Nacharin Phiphopthatsanee; Wiwat Wajanavisit; Patarawan Woratanarat; Sukij Laohajaroensombat; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-09-13

4.  Should age influence the choice of quantitative bone assessment technique in elderly women? The EPIDOS study.

Authors:  A M Schott; B Kassaï Koupaï; D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; R Ecochard; D C Bauer; G Bréart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; J Jurvelin; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Predictive ability of heel quantitative ultrasound for incident fractures: an individual-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; J A Kanis; A Odén; N C Harvey; D Bauer; J González-Macias; D Hans; S Kaptoge; M A Krieg; T Kwok; F Marin; A Moayyeri; E Orwoll; C Gluёr; H Johansson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.