Literature DB >> 12464710

What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis?

Paul D Miller, Christopher F Njeh, Larry G Jankowski, Leon Lenchik.   

Abstract

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at central skeletal sites with dual X-ray absorptiometry is the "gold standard" both for the diagnosis of osteoporosis using the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) and for monitoring individuals receiving antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis. Measurement of BMD at peripheral sites (peripheral BMD) can be used to assess fracture risk, but application of the WHO criteria gives different prevalence values for "osteoporosis" with peripheral devices, and different risks for fracture at the same cut points. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference panelists reached the following conclusions about peripheral BMD testing: First, WHO T-score criteria should not be used with peripheral devices. Second, for the identification of a level for peripheral BMD measurements above which osteoporosis is unlikely, device-specific cut points for peripheral BMD should be identified that have 90% sensitivity for identifying patients who have osteoporosis (T-score of -2.5 or below) based on measurements of the spine and hip. If central BMD testing is available, patients who have peripheral BMD below the 90% sensitivity level should have a central BMD measurement. If central BMD testing is not available, peripheral BMD might be used for identification of patients who are likely to have osteoporosis. Risk-based cut points were preferred to prevalence based cut points, and, again, device-specific cut points are needed. For patients tested only with a peripheral BMD device whose result is intermediate, clinical judgment would be needed. Third, peripheral BMD testing should not be used for monitoring patients who are taking antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis. Fourth, peripheral BMD testing performs best when used for postmenopausal women. Further research on all these issues is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464710     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3s:s39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  14 in total

1.  Variations in morphological and biomechanical indices at the distal radius in subjects with identical BMD.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yasushi Imashuku; Masahiko Takada; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-05-28

Review 3.  The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  J A Clowes; N F A Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Update on bone density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  K A Ward; J Cotton; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.

Authors:  H Salminen; M Sääf; H Ringertz; L-E Strender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Special report on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  E M Lewiecki; D L Kendler; G M Kiebzak; P Schmeer; R L Prince; G El-Hajj Fuleihan; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; J Jurvelin; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.