Literature DB >> 18177156

Across-channel interference in intensity discrimination: the role of practice and listening strategy.

Emily Buss1.   

Abstract

Pure tone intensity discrimination thresholds can be elevated by the introduction of remote maskers with roved level. This effect is on the order of 10 dB [10 log(DeltaII)] in some conditions and can be demonstrated under conditions of little or no energetic masking. The current study examined the effect of practice and observer strategy on this phenomenon. Experiment 1 included observers who had no formal experience with intensity discrimination and provided training over 6 h on a single masked intensity discrimination task to assess learning effects. Thresholds fell with practice for most observers, with significant improvements in six out of eight cases. Despite these improvements significant masking remained in all cases. The second experiment assessed trial-by-trial effects of roved masker level. Conditional probability of a "signal-present" response as a function of the rove value assigned to each of the two masker tones indicates fundamental differences among observers' processing strategies, even after 6 h of practice. The variability in error patterns across practiced listeners suggests that observers approach the task differently, though this variability does not appear to be related to sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177156      PMCID: PMC2265090          DOI: 10.1121/1.2816569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory profile analysis of irregular sound spectra.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effective properties of multicomponent simultaneous maskers under conditions of uncertainty.

Authors:  D L Neff; B P Callaghan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: the effects of filtered noise.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

Authors:  D M Green; C R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A comparison of the effectiveness of across-channel cues available in comodulation masking release and profile analysis tasks.

Authors:  D A Fantini; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus classification procedure for assessing the extent to which binaural processing is spectrally analytic or synthetic.

Authors:  R H Dye; W A Yost; M A Stellmack; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of ear of entry and of octave similarity.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Ervin R Hafter; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.