Literature DB >> 14670577

The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage.

Jason B Mattingley1, Nadja Berberovic, Louise Corben, Melissa J Slavin, Michael E R Nicholls, John L Bradshaw.   

Abstract

The two cerebral hemispheres in humans have been suggested to control contralaterally opposed attentional biases. These biases may be revealed by unilateral hemispheric damage, which often causes contralesional spatial neglect, particularly when the right hemisphere (RH) is affected. Subtle attentional biases have also been observed in normal observers in tasks requiring judgements of horizontal spatial extent, brightness, numerosity and size. Here, we examined attentional biases for judging the darker of two left-right mirror-reversed brightness gradients under conditions of free viewing (the greyscales task). We compared performances of patients with damage to the RH (n=78) and left hemisphere (LH; n=20) with those of normal controls (n=20). Controls showed a small but significant leftward bias, implying a subtle asymmetry favouring the RH. In contrast, RH and LH patients showed extreme rightward and leftward biases, respectively, both of which differed significantly from that of controls. For the patient groups, performance on clinical tests of neglect (cancellation and line bisection) did not predict their greyscales scores. Pathological biases were present in patients without clinical neglect or visual field defects, suggesting that the attentional bias measured by the greyscales task can be dissociated from clinical neglect and visual sensory loss. The greyscales task offers an efficient means of quantifying pathological attentional biases in unilateral lesion patients; it is easy to administer and score, and may be particularly useful for clinical trials of recovery and rehabilitation following stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14670577     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  28 in total

1.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Andrea M Loftus; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

5.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Directional bias in the body while walking through a doorway: its association with attentional and motor factors.

Authors:  Hiroya Fujikake; Takahiro Higuchi; Kuniyasu Imanaka; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The neural basis for spatial relations.

Authors:  Prin X Amorapanth; Page Widick; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye-blink rate predicts individual differences in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Richard J Davidson; Rachel Tomer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.