Literature DB >> 18536911

The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Matthias Niemeier1, Vaughan V W Singh, Matthew Keough, Nadine Akbar.   

Abstract

A fundamental question of attentional research concerns the perceptual consequences of attention. Spatial attention can enhance stimuli within the focus of attention relative to stimuli outside; or attention can remove the influence of distracting stimuli and other forms of external noise inside the focus of attention. It is known that both strategies apply depending on how attention is cued to a location in space. Here we asked which strategy applies in an uncued situation in which people show a spontaneous bias of attention to the left side. To measure bias, we used a gratingscales task with stimuli corrupted by pixel noise. If biased attention resulted in biased stimulus enhancement its effect should be largest when there is little noise or few distractors within the attended region, and bias should decline with increasing noise. If, however, bias caused distractors to be removed asymmetrically, larger bias should show up with noisy stimuli. We found that bias rose exponentially as noise increased, in agreement with the external noise removal model, and we found evidence that noise modified interhemispheric competition between attentional systems. Our data offer new insights into the neural mechanisms of the right-hemisphere dominance in spatial and attentional tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536911     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1438-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  61 in total

1.  Noise exclusion in spatial attention.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

2.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

Authors:  D K Lee; L Itti; C Koch; J Braun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatial attention: different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues?

Authors:  Z L Lu; B A Dosher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  P Nichelli; M Rinaldi; R Cubelli
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The anatomy of visual neglect.

Authors:  Dominic J Mort; Paresh Malhotra; Sabira K Mannan; Chris Rorden; Alidz Pambakian; Chris Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Boge Stojanoski; Vaughan W A Singh; Eddie Chu
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  4 in total

1.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Jagjot Kaur; Hana Abbas; Ming Wu; Wenyi Luo; Sinan Osman; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.