Literature DB >> 14663543

Influence of whole-body pitch tilt and kinesthetic cues on the perceived gravity-referenced eye level.

L Bringoux1, K Tamura, M Faldon, M A Gresty, A M Bronstein.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of whole body tilt and lifting the arm against gravity on perceptual estimates of the Gravity-Referenced Eye Level (GREL), which corresponds to the subjective earth-referenced horizon. The results showed that the perceived GREL was influenced by body tilt, that is, lowered with forward tilt and elevated with backward tilt of the body. GREL estimates obtained by arm movements without vision were more biased by whole-body tilt than purely visual estimates. Strikingly, visual GREL estimates became more dependent on whole-body tilt when the indication of level was obtained by arm lifting. These findings indicate that active motor involvement and/or the addition of kinesthetic information increases the body tilt-induced bias when making GREL judgements. The introduction of motor/kinaesthetic cues may induce a switch from a semi-geocentric to a more egocentric frame of reference. This result challenges the assumption that combining non-conflicting multiple sensory inputs and/or using intermodal information provided during action should improve perceptual performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663543     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1742-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; W P Medendorp; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon.

Authors:  T L Ooi; B Wu; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pointing movements may be produced in different frames of reference depending on the task demand.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; Philippe S Archambault; Sergei V Adamovich; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.

Authors:  L Matin; W X Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perceived body position and the visual horizontal.

Authors:  F Mast; T Jarchow
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Perceptual thresholds of radial accelerations as indicated by visually perceived eye level.

Authors:  C Raphel; P A Barraud
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1994-03

7.  Joint position sense in simulated changed-gravity environments.

Authors:  O Bock
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1994-07

8.  Interaction of labyrinthine and somatoreceptor inputs as determinants of the subjective vertical.

Authors:  S Lechner-Steinleitner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1978-03-03

9.  Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body-fixed axes.

Authors:  W G Darling; J M Hondzinski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation.

Authors:  D Anastasopoulos; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field.

Authors:  J-M Prieur; C Bourdin; J-L Vercher; F Sarès; J Blouin; G M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference.

Authors:  L Bringoux; G Robic; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of gaze elevation on estimating the possibility of passing under high obstacles during body tilt.

Authors:  Aurore Bourrelly; Lionel Bringoux; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial localization investigated by continuous pointing during visual and gravitoinertial changes.

Authors:  C Scotto Di Cesare; L Bringoux; C Bourdin; F R Sarlegna; D R Mestre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Otolith signals contribute to inter-individual differences in the perception of gravity-centered space.

Authors:  C Cian; P A Barraud; A C Paillard; S Hidot; P Denise; J Ventre-Dominey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Do we use a priori knowledge of gravity when making elbow rotations?

Authors:  Ilona J Pinter; Arthur J van Soest; Maarten F Bobbert; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Estimation of the horizon in photographed outdoor scenes by human and machine.

Authors:  Christian Herdtweck; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.