Literature DB >> 10382626

Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body-fixed axes.

W G Darling1, J M Hondzinski.   

Abstract

The major purpose of this research was to determine whether kinesthetic/proprioceptive perceptions of the earth-fixed vertical axis are more accurate than perceptions of intrinsic axes. In one experiment, accuracy of alignment of the forearm to earth-fixed vertical and head- and trunk-longitudinal axes by seven blindfolded subjects was compared in four tasks: (1) Earth-Arm--arm (humerus) orientation was manipulated by the experimenter; subjects aligned the forearm parallel to the vertical axis, which was also aligned with the head and trunk longitudinal axis; (2) Head--head, trunk, and upper-limb orientations were manipulated by the experimenter, subjects aligned the forearm parallel to the longitudinal axis of the head using only elbow flexion/extension and shoulder internal/external rotation; (3) Trunk--same as (2), except that subjects aligned the forearm parallel to the trunk-longitudinal axis; (4) Earth--same as (2), except that subjects aligned the forearm parallel to the earth-fixed vertical. Head, trunk, and gravitational axes were never parallel in tasks 2, 3, and 4 so that subjects could not simultaneously match their forearm to all three axes. The results showed that the errors for alignment of the forearm with the earth-fixed vertical were lower than for the trunk- and head-longitudinal axes. Furthermore, errors in the Earth condition were less dependent on alterations of the head and trunk orientation than in the Head and Trunk conditions. These data strongly suggest that the earth-fixed vertical is used as one axis for the kinesthetic sensory coordinate system that specifies upper-limb orientation at the perceptual level. We also examined the effects of varying gravitational torques at the elbow and shoulder on the accuracy of forearm alignment to earth-fixed axes. Adding a 450 g load to the forearm to increase gravitational torques when the forearm is not vertical did not improve the accuracy of forearm alignment with the vertical. Furthermore, adding small, variably sized loads (between which the subjects could not distinguish at the perceptual level) to the forearm just proximal to the wrist produced similar errors in aligning the forearm with the vertical and horizontal. Forearm-positioning errors were not correlated with the size of the load, as would be expected if gravitational torques affected forearm-position sense. We conclude that gravitational torques exerted about the shoulder and elbow do not make significant contributions to sensing forearm-orientation relative to earth-fixed axes when the upper-limb segments are not constrained by external supports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10382626     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference.

Authors:  L Bringoux; G Robic; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Location memory biases reveal the challenges of coordinating visual and kinesthetic reference frames.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Clayton Peterson; Warren Darling; John P Spencer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Torques do not influence proprioceptive localization of the hand.

Authors:  I A Kuling; E Brenner; J B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Kinesthetic perception of visually specified axes.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Robert Bartelt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Unilateral posterior parietal lobe lesions disrupt kinaesthetic representation of forearm orientation.

Authors:  W G Darling; R Bartelt; M Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Role of gravitational versus egocentric cues for human spatial orientation.

Authors:  Nils Bury; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perception of hand motion direction uses a gravitational reference.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Angela N Viaene; Clayton R Peterson; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.