Literature DB >> 11424645

Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.

J C Ziegler1, A M Jacobs, D Klüppel.   

Abstract

Computational models that implement a serial mechanism of phonological assembly predict interactions between the size of the pseudohomophone (PsH) effect and stimulus length. Models with frequency-sensitive word representations predict baseword frequency effects. These predictions were tested in a lexical-decision task. The results showed constant PsH effects across different word lengths (in favor of parallel phonological activation) and baseword frequency effects (in favor of frequency-sensitive representations). However, the baseword frequency effect was opposite of what the models predicted. This result is most easily accommodated by models that assume an orthographic verification mechanism. The plausibility of such a mechanism was further supported by the results of 2 additional experiments investigating the effects of response speed and spelling probability (feedback consistency) on the size of the PsH effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11424645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Lawrence Locker; Greg B Simpson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

2.  A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect.

Authors:  Conrad Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

3.  Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: two-way mirror effects.

Authors:  D Vaughn Becker; Stephen D Goldinger; Gregory O Stone
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

4.  Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect?

Authors:  Christopher R Sears; Paul D Siakaluk; Verna C Chow; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-07

5.  Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Mario Braun; Florian Hutzler; Johannes C Ziegler; Michael Dambacher; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Reading Skill and Exposure to Orthography Influence Speech Production.

Authors:  Meredith Saletta; Lisa Goffman; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2015-04-13

7.  Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Daragh E Sibley; David A Balota; Roger Ratcliff; Jay Rueckl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  A dual-route approach to orthographic processing.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-13

9.  Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Speed and accuracy of dyslexic versus typical word recognition: an eye-movement investigation.

Authors:  Richard Kunert; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.