Literature DB >> 10862059

Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with (201)Thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography.

J T Keijer1, A C van Rossum, M J van Eenige, J J Bax, F C Visser, J J Teule, C A Visser.   

Abstract

The clinical value of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (MRI) was investigated by quantitative comparison with (201)thallium-single-photon emission computed tomography ((201)TI-SPECT) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Short-axis imaging was performed during dipyridamole administration in 13 patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. Using inner and outer contours, the myocardium was divided into 30 contiguous, radial regions. Defining a perfusion defect as a region with less than 90% of maximum (201)TI intensity, nine patients had a matching perfusion defect, two had no defect on both (201)TI-SPECT or MRI, and one had a defect on (201)TI-SPECT but not on MRI. One patient had a defect on both modalities but with inaccurate localization. Three perfusion parameters were investigated: a) maximum contrast enhancement (MCE); b) slope of the signal intensity versus time curve; and c) inverse mean transit time (1/MTT). The sensitivity and specificity of MCE in the detection of perfusion abnormalities with TI-SPECT as the reference method were 71% and 71%, respectively (slope 77% and 61%, 1/MTT 44% and 70%). Furthermore, correlations were calculated per patient for the entire circumference of the short-axis myocardium. Median correlations were as follows: MCE 0.92, slope 0.91, and 1/MTT 0.40. Mismatches between (201)TI defects and defects on MRI resulted in low mean correlations (MCE 0.45, slope 0.46, and 1/MTT 0.26). There was a trend between severity of perfusion defects on MRI (using MCE) and QCA stenosis area (r = -0.56, P = 0.06). Thus, MRI and (201)TI-SPECT demonstrate fair agreement in the assessment of perfusion defects but show moderate correlation when the entire short-axis myocardium is correlated. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862059     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200006)11:6<607::aid-jmri6>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

1.  Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Holger Eggebrecht; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis and interpretation of CT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Carolina Valdiviezo; Marietta Ambrose; Vishal Mehra; Albert C Lardo; Joao A C Lima; Richard T George
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Sven Plein; Marcel Breeuwer; John P Ridgway; David Higgins; Penelope J Thorley; Gerhard Schuler; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the clinical cardiologist.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Robert Delarochelliere; Gerald Barbeau; Bernard Noel; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.

Authors:  Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging-practical considerations: acquisition, image analysis, interpretation, and challenges.

Authors:  Vishal C Mehra; Marietta Ambrose; Carolina Valdiviezo-Schlomp; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Joao A C Lima; Richard T George
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Accelerated, high spatial resolution cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Timothy Lockie; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Surgical ventricular restoration based on evaluation of myocardial viability with delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mitsugu Ogawa; Kiyoshi Doi; Yoshiaki Yamada; Atsushi Fukumoto; Kazunari Okawa; Tamotsu Kan'bara; Keitarou Koushi; Hirotshi Itoh; Tsunehiko Nishimura; Hitoshi Yaku
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-04

10.  Combined myocardial stress perfusion imaging and myocardial stress tagging for detection of coronary artery disease at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Daniel Thomas; Katharina Strach; Carsten Meyer; Claas P Naehle; Sebastian Schaare; Sven Wasmann; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.