Literature DB >> 11961106

Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Cristian I Castillo-Davis1, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that evolutionary changes will be more frequent in later ontogeny than early ontogeny because of developmental constraint. To test this hypothesis, a genomewide examination of molecular evolution through ontogeny was carried out using comparative genomic data in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. We found that the mean rate of amino acid replacement is not significantly different between genes expressed during and after embryogenesis. However, synonymous substitution rates differed significantly between these two classes. A genomewide survey of correlation between codon bias and expression level found codon bias to be significantly correlated with mRNA expression (r(s) = -0.30 and P < 10(-131)) but does not alone explain differences in dS between classes. Surprisingly, it was found that genes expressed after embryogenesis have a significantly greater number of duplicates in both the C. elegans and C. briggsae genomes (P < 10(-20) and P < 10(-13)) when compared with early-expressed and nonmodulated genes. A similarity in the distribution of duplicates of nonmodulated and early-expressed genes, as well as a disproportionately higher number of early pseudogenes, lend support to the hypothesis that this difference in duplicate number is caused by selection against gene duplicates of early-expressed genes, reflecting developmental constraint. Developmental constraint at the level of gene duplication may have important implications for macroevolutionary change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11961106     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  35 in total

1.  Elevated rates of protein secretion, evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes.

Authors:  Eitan E Winter; Leo Goodstadt; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Fyodor A Kondrashov; Daniel L Hartl; Rob J Kulathinal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  cis-Regulatory and protein evolution in orthologous and duplicate genes.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Daniel L Hartl; Guillaume Achaz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Protein evolution in the context of Drosophila development.

Authors:  Jerel C Davis; Onn Brandman; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Conservation of dual-targeted proteins in Arabidopsis and rice points to a similar pattern of gene-family evolution.

Authors:  Carolina V Morgante; Ricardo A O Rodrigues; Phellippe A S Marbach; Camila M Borgonovi; Daniel S Moura; Marcio C Silva-Filho
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Comparison of diverse developmental transcriptomes reveals that coexpression of gene neighbors is not evolutionarily conserved.

Authors:  Itai Yanai; Craig P Hunter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Molecular correlates of genes exhibiting RNAi phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur; Tovah Salcedo; Anne M Estes; Jeffrey M Good; Elizabeth Wood; Thomas Hartl; Heather Maughan; Jannine Strempel; Baomin Wang; Anthony C Bryan; Melissa Dellos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development.

Authors:  David A Garfield; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-07-21

9.  Codon usage is associated with the evolutionary age of genes in metazoan genomes.

Authors:  Yosef Prat; Menachem Fromer; Nathan Linial; Michal Linial
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, constraint, and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila.

Authors:  Carlo G Artieri; Wilfried Haerty; Rama S Singh
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.