Literature DB >> 17329048

Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Jonathan B Fritz1, Mounya Elhilali, Stephen V David, Shihab A Shamma.   

Abstract

Acoustic filter properties of A1 neurons can dynamically adapt to stimulus statistics, classical conditioning, instrumental learning and the changing auditory attentional focus. We have recently developed an experimental paradigm that allows us to view cortical receptive field plasticity on-line as the animal meets different behavioral challenges by attending to salient acoustic cues and changing its cortical filters to enhance performance. We propose that attention is the key trigger that initiates a cascade of events leading to the dynamic receptive field changes that we observe. In our paradigm, ferrets were initially trained, using conditioned avoidance training techniques, to discriminate between background noise stimuli (temporally orthogonal ripple combinations) and foreground tonal target stimuli. They learned to generalize the task for a wide variety of distinct background and foreground target stimuli. We recorded cortical activity in the awake behaving animal and computed on-line spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) of single neurons in A1. We observed clear, predictable task-related changes in STRF shape while the animal performed spectral tasks (including single tone and multi-tone detection, and two-tone discrimination) with different tonal targets. A different set of task-related changes occurred when the animal performed temporal tasks (including gap detection and click-rate discrimination). Distinctive cortical STRF changes may constitute a "task-specific signature". These spectral and temporal changes in cortical filters occur quite rapidly, within 2min of task onset, and fade just as quickly after task completion, or in some cases, persisted for hours. The same cell could multiplex by differentially changing its receptive field in different task conditions. On-line dynamic task-related changes, as well as persistent plastic changes, were observed at a single-unit, multi-unit and population level. Auditory attention is likely to be pivotal in mediating these task-related changes since the magnitude of STRF changes correlated with behavioral performance on tasks with novel targets. Overall, these results suggest the presence of an attention-triggered plasticity algorithm in A1 that can swiftly change STRF shape by transforming receptive fields to enhance figure/ground separation, by using a contrast matched filter to filter out the background, while simultaneously enhancing the salient acoustic target in the foreground. These results favor the view of a nimble, dynamic, attentive and adaptive brain that can quickly reshape its sensory filter properties and sensori-motor links on a moment-to-moment basis, depending upon the current challenges the animal faces. In this review, we summarize our results in the context of a broader survey of the field of auditory attention, and then consider neuronal networks that could give rise to this phenomenon of attention-driven receptive field plasticity in A1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329048      PMCID: PMC2077083          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  189 in total

1.  Two types of auditory neglect.

Authors:  A Bellmann; R Meuli; S Clarke
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Miki M Fukui; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location.

Authors:  Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.

Authors:  Jennifer A Johnson; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

9.  Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reward expectation, orientation of attention and locus coeruleus-medial frontal cortex interplay during learning.

Authors:  Sebastien Bouret; Susan J Sara
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  69 in total

1.  Presynaptic gating of postsynaptically expressed plasticity at mature thalamocortical synapses.

Authors:  Jay A Blundon; Ildar T Bayazitov; Stanislav S Zakharenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dynamics of phase-independent spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex of the awake ferret.

Authors:  D A Depireux; H D Dobbins; P Marvit; B Shechter
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Spatial heterogeneity of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Brian N Carriere; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dynamic changes in level influence spatial coding in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Thomas J Park; Antje Brand; Ursula Koch; Maki Ikebuchi; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.