Literature DB >> 14620059

Dose perturbation in the presence of metallic implants: treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo simulations.

Elinore Wieslander1, Tommy Knöös.   

Abstract

An increasing number of patients receiving radiation therapy have metallic implants such as hip prostheses. Therefore, beams are normally set up to avoid irradiation through the implant; however, this cannot always be accomplished. In such situations, knowledge of the accuracy of the used treatment planning system (TPS) is required. Two algorithms, the pencil beam (PB) and the collapsed cone (CC), are implemented in the studied TPS. Comparisons are made with Monte Carlo simulations for 6 and 18 MV. The studied materials are steel, CoCrMo, Orthinox, TiAlV and Ti. Monte Carlo simulated depth dose curves and dose profiles are compared to CC and PB calculated data. The CC algorithm shows overall a better agreement with Monte Carlo than the PB algorithm. Thus, it is recommended to use the CC algorithm to get the most accurate dose calculation both for the planning target volume and for tissues adjacent to the implants when beams are set up to pass through implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620059     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/20/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyed Nejad
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

2.  Investigation of various energy deposition kernel refinements for the convolution∕superposition method.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David Eklund; Nathan L Childress; Rebecca M Howell; Dragan Mirkovic; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Systematic survey of the dose enhancement in tissue-equivalent materials facing medium- and high-Z backscatterers exposed to X-rays with energies from 5 to 250 keV.

Authors:  M Seidenbusch; D Harder; D Regulla
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Ramachandran Prabhakar; Milind Kumar; Suja Cheruliyil; Silpa Jayakumar; Satheesan Balasubramanian; Jim Cramb
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-04-28

5.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; James R Kerns; Jessica L Nute; Xinming Liu; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill; Dragan Mirkovic; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Xinming Liu; Dragan Mirkovic; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Jussi Sillanpaa; Michael Lovelock; Boris Mueller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Dose distribution near thin titanium plate for skull fixation irradiated by a 4-MV photon beam.

Authors:  Tomohiro Shimozato; Keisuke Yasui; Ryota Kawanami; Kousaku Habara; Yuichi Aoyama; Katsuyoshi Tabushi; Yasunori Obata
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-04

9.  Evaluation of the radiotherapy treatment planning in the presence of a magnetic valve tissue expander.

Authors:  Débora M Trombetta; Simone C Cardoso; Victor G L Alves; Alessandro Facure; Delano V S Batista; Ademir X da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The prospect of carbon fiber implants in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ni Xin-ye; Tang Xiao-bin; Geng Chang-ran; Chen Da
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.