Literature DB >> 31375297

The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Jussi Sillanpaa1, Michael Lovelock2, Boris Mueller3.   

Abstract

Metallic objects, such as dental fillings, cause artifacts in computed tomography (CT) scans. We quantify the contouring and dosimetric effects of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction (O-MAR), in head and neck radiotherapy. The ease of organ contouring was assessed by having a radiation oncologist identify the CT data set with or without O-MAR for each of 28 patients that was easier to contour. The effect on contouring was quantified further by having the physician recontour parotid glands, previously drawn by him on the O-MAR scans, on uncorrected scans, and calculating the Dice coefficent (a measure of overlap) for the contours. Radiotherapy plans originally generated on scans reconstructed with O-MAR were recalculated on scans without metal artifact correction. The study was done using the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) dose calculation algorithm. The 15 patients with a planning target volume (PTV) extending to the same slice as the artifacts were used for this part of the study. The normal tissue doses were not significantly affected. The PTV mean dose and V95 were not affected, but the cold spots became less severe in the O-MAR corrected plans, with the minimum point dose on average being 4.1% higher. In 79% of the cases, the radiation oncologist identified the O-MAR scan as easier to contour; in 11% he chose the uncorrected scan and in 11% the scans were judged to have equal quality. A total of nine parotid glands (on both scans-18 contours in total) in 5 patients were recontoured. The average Dice coefficient for parotids drawn with and without O-MAR was found to be 0.775 +/- 0.045. The O-MAR algorithm does not produce a significant dosimetric effect in head and neck plans when using the AAA dose calculation algorithm. It can therefore be used for improved contouring accuracy without updating the critical structure tolerance doses and target coverage expectations.
Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; IMRT; Metal artifact correction; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31375297      PMCID: PMC6989373          DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  37 in total

1.  Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.

Authors:  K Bush; S Zavgorodni; I Gagne; R Townson; W Ansbacher; W Beckham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Radiosurgical treatment planning of AVM following embolization with Onyx: possible dosage error in treatment planning can be averted.

Authors:  Natan Shtraus; Dan Schifter; Benjamin W Corn; Shimon Maimon; Shlomi Alani; Vladimir Frolov; Diana Matceyevsky; Andrew A Kanner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography.

Authors:  Esther Meyer; Rainer Raupach; Michael Lell; Bernhard Schmidt; Marc Kachelriess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Suppression of metal artifacts in CT using a reconstruction procedure that combines MAP and projection completion.

Authors:  Catherine Lemmens; David Faul; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Spadea; Joost Mathias Verburg; Guido Baroni; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dose-calculation algorithms in the context of inhomogeneity corrections for high energy photon beams.

Authors:  Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  An opposite view data replacement approach for reducing artifacts due to metallic dental objects.

Authors:  Mehran Yazdi; Meghdad Asadi Lari; Gaston Bernier; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Experiences of xerostomia after radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Yue Zhao; Henrik Jansson; Xiaocen Chen; Jan Mårtensson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  The dosimetric impact of dental implants on head-and-neck volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Mu-Han Lin; Jinsheng Li; Robert A Price; Lu Wang; Chung-Chi Lee; C-M Ma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.

Authors:  Arun S Oinam; Lakhwant Singh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Geometric and dosimetric impact of 3D generative adversarial network-based metal artifact reduction algorithm on VMAT and IMPT for the head and neck region.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Megumi Nakao; Keiho Imanishi; Hideaki Hirashima; Yusuke Tsuruta
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.