Literature DB >> 10025606

Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: the behavior interleaved gradients technique.

G F Eden1, J E Joseph, H E Brown, C P Brown, T A Zeffiro.   

Abstract

A major problem associated with the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the attendant gradient noise, which causes undesirable auditory system stimulation. A method is presented here that delays data acquisition to a period immediately after task completion, utilizing the physiological delay and dispersion between neuronal activity and its resulting hemodynamic lag. Subjects performed finger movements with the gradients off, followed by a rest period with the gradients on. This resulted in task-related signals comparable to those obtained with concurrent task performance and image data acquisition. This behavior interleaved gradients technique may be particularly useful for the studies involving auditory stimulation or overt verbal responses.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10025606     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199901)41:1<13::aid-mrm4>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  45 in total

Review 1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging: imaging techniques and contrast mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Howseman; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: an event-related fMRI study employing overt responses.

Authors:  G I de Zubicaray; S J Wilson; K L McMahon; S Muthiah
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Ethan Treglia; Michael Ho; Elina Kaplan; Shahid Bashir; Roy Hamilton; H Branch Coslett; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Learning following Semantic Mediation Treatment in a case of Phonologic Alexia.

Authors:  Jacquie Kurland; Carlos R Cortes; Marko Wilke; Anne J Sperling; Susan N Lott; Malle A Tagamets; John Vanmeter; Rhonda B Friedman
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.