Literature DB >> 8134603

Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences.

F G Shellock1, S M Morisoli, M Ziarati.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess acoustic noise levels for ambient noise and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T during use of six "worst-case" pulse sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acoustic noise measurements were obtained at the entrance, center, and exit of the magnet bore of the MR system by means of a specially modified device that is unaffected by electromagnetic radiation.
RESULTS: The highest ambient noise level was 73 dB at both the entrance and exit of the magnet bore (A-weighted scale). The highest noise levels during MR imaging occurred during use of a gradient-echo (GRE) pulse sequence and was 102 dB at the entrance and exit of the magnet bore and 103 dB at the center (A-weighted scale).
CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging performed with the worst-case pulse sequences did not produce noise levels that exceeded federal guidelines. Noise levels were, however, high enough to impair oral communication and annoy patients. Thus, techniques to attenuate acoustic noise and allow improved operator-patient communication should be used during MR imaging, especially during use of GRE pulse sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134603     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert.

Authors:  G Z Yao; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE of the brain.

Authors:  L van den Hauwe; P M Parizel; J W Van Goethem; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; David M Grodzki; Markus Domschke; Moritz Albrecht; Boris Bodelle; Katrin Eichler; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Quiet PROPELLER MRI techniques match the quality of conventional PROPELLER brain imaging techniques.

Authors:  I Corcuera-Solano; A Doshi; P S Pawha; D Gui; A Gaddipati; L Tanenbaum
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.