Literature DB >> 14596473

A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy".

Jeroen G W Raaijmakers1.   

Abstract

The proper analysis of experiments using language materials has been a source of controversy and debate among researchers. We summarize the main issues and discuss the solutions that have been presented. Even though the major issues have been dealt with extensively in the literature, there still exists quite a bit of confusion about how to analyze the data from such experiments. We discuss a number of the most frequently voiced objections. In particular, we discuss the issue of what happens if in a counterbalanced design only some of the items show the treatment effect. Finally, a possible solution is discussed for the case where only partial matching of items between conditions is possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14596473     DOI: 10.1037/h0087421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  22 in total

1.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Concept mediation in trilingual translation: evidence from response time and repetition priming patterns.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Sabrina L K Gallard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: some words are more transparent than others.

Authors:  Cristina Burani; Laura Barca; Andrew W Ellis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  The effect of the balance of orthographic neighborhood distribution in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Christelle Robert; Stéphanie Mathey; Daniel Zagar
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-09

5.  Semantic priming over unrelated trials: evidence for different effects in word and picture naming.

Authors:  Melanie Vitkovitch; Elisa Cooper-Pye; Antony G Leadbetter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

6.  The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

7.  Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

8.  Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Jimmy de Rooij; René Zeelenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

9.  Direction of association between targets in a RSVP task influences priming at very short but not long SOAs.

Authors:  Milton T Nyawata; Karen Murphy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-04

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.