Literature DB >> 16496717

Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?

Rochelle S Newman1, James R Sawusch, Paul A Luce.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that the number and frequency of lexical neighbors affects the perception of individual sounds within a nonword in a phoneme identification task. In the present research, the issue of what items should be considered part of a word's neighborhood was explored. These experiments, in which both lexical decision and phoneme identification tasks were used, demonstrate that lexical neighborhood effects are not limited to words that match the target item syllable initially (the cohort). Words that differ from a target only in their first phoneme influence the process of lexical access. This argues against the notion that word onsets serve a unique or special purpose in word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16496717     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; H E Moss; S van Halen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

7.  Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.

Authors:  R A Fox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech.

Authors:  R A Cole; J Jakimik; W E Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Jocelyn R Folk; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.