Literature DB >> 19487746

Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors.

Diane Pecher1, Jimmy de Rooij, René Zeelenberg.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether semantic properties of a word's orthographic neighbors are activated during visual word recognition. In two experiments, words were presented with a property that was not true for the word itself. We manipulated whether the property was true for an orthographic neighbor of the word. Our results showed that rejection of the property was slower and less accurate when the property was true for a neighbor than when the property was not true for a neighbor. These findings indicate that semantic information is activated before orthographic processing is finished. The present results are problematic for the links model (Forster, 2006; Forster & Hector, 2002) that was recently proposed in order to bring form-first models of visual word recognition into line with previously reported findings (Forster & Hector, 2002; Pecher, Zeelenberg, & Wagenmakers, 2005; Rodd, 2004).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487746     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.5.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?

Authors:  P M Pexman; S J Lupker
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

2.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.

Authors:  Penny M Pexman; Stephen J Lupker; Yasushi Hino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

4.  Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.

Authors:  Yasushi Hino; Stephen J Lupker; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer M Rodd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

6.  Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Are coffee and toffee served in a cup? Ortho-phonologically mediated associative priming.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Carreiras; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition.

Authors:  D C Bourassa; D Besner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

9.  Long-term semantic priming: a computational account and empirical evidence.

Authors:  S Becker; M Moscovitch; M Behrmann; S Joordens
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.