Literature DB >> 14592660

Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

E Matt Ritter1, David A McClusky, Andrew B Lederman, Anthony G Gallagher, C Daniel Smith.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the GI Mentor II virtual reality simulator can distinguish the psychomotor skills of intermediately experienced endoscopists from those of novices, and do so with a high level of consistency and reliability. A total of five intermediate and nine novice endoscopists were evaluated using the EndoBubble abstract psychomotor task. Each subject performed three repetitions of the task. Performance and error data were recorded for each trial. The intermediate group performed better than the novice group in each trial. The differences were significant in trial 1 for balloons popped (P=.001), completion time (P=.04), and errors (P=.03). Trial 2 showed significance only for balloons popped (P=.002). Trial 3 showed significance for balloons popped (P=.004) and errors (P=.008). The novice group showed significant improvement between trials 1 and 3 (P<0.05). No improvement was noted in the intermediate group. Measures of consistency and reliability were greater than 0.8 in both groups with the exception of novice completion time where test-retest reliability was 0.74. The GI Mentor II simulator can distinguish between novice and intermediate endoscopists. The simulator assesses skills with levels of consistency and reliability required for high-stakes assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14592660     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-003-0032-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  13 in total

1.  Training to competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a plea for continuous measuring of objective end points.

Authors:  O W Cass
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Development of colonoscopy teaching simulation.

Authors:  C B Williams; B P Saunders; J S Bladen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; K Richie; N McClure; J McGuigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  A Ferlitsch; P Glauninger; A Gupper; M Schillinger; M Haefner; A Gangl; R Schoefl
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve.

Authors:  B R Parry; S M Williams
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1991-06

7.  The Libby Zion case. One step forward or two steps backward?

Authors:  D A Asch; R M Parker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.

Authors:  O W Cass; M L Freeman; C J Peine; R T Zera; G R Onstad
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.

Authors:  J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  A new endoscopic simulator.

Authors:  S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  24 in total

1.  Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; H McCarthy; J I Lew; A Egan; P Christos; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopy specialist in simulated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bo Westman; E Matt Ritter; Ann Kjellin; Leif Törkvist; Torsten Wredmark; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  S N Buzink; A D Koch; J Heemskerk; S M B I Botden; R H M Goossens; H de Ridder; E J Schoon; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  E M Ritter; T C Cox; K D Trinca; J P Pearl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI Mentor II systems: results from the Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum.

Authors:  Kent R Van Sickle; Lauren Buck; Ross Willis; Alicia Mangram; Michael S Truitt; Mohsen Shabahang; Scott Thomas; Lee Trombetta; Brian Dunkin; Daniel Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  First-year residents outperform third-year residents after simulation-based education in critical care medicine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Singer; Thomas C Corbridge; Clara J Schroedl; Jane E Wilcox; Elaine R Cohen; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Expert benchmark for the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  Roy Phitayakorn; Jeffrey M Marks; Harry L Reynolds; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.