Literature DB >> 17522894

Random homologous pairing and incomplete sister chromatid alignment are common in angiosperm interphase nuclei.

Veit Schubert1, Young-Min Kim, Alexandre Berr, Jörg Fuchs, Armin Meister, Sylvia Marschner, Ingo Schubert.   

Abstract

The chromosome arrangement in interphase nuclei is of growing interest, e.g., the spatial vicinity of homologous sequences is decisive for efficient repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination, and close alignment of sister chromatids is considered as a prerequisite for their bipolar orientation and subsequent segregation during nuclear division. To study the degree of homologous pairing and of sister chromatid alignment in plants, we applied fluorescent in situ hybridisation with specific bacterial artificial chromosome inserts to interphase nuclei. Previously we found in Arabidopsis thaliana and in A. lyrata positional homologous pairing at random, and, except for centromere regions, sister chromatids were frequently not aligned. To test whether these features are typical for higher plants or depend on genome size, chromosome organisation and/or phylogenetic affiliation, we investigated distinct individual loci in other species. The positional pairing of these loci was mainly random. The highest frequency of sister alignment (in >93% of homologues) was found for centromeres, some rDNA and a few other high copy loci. Apparently, somatic homologous pairing is not a typical feature of angiosperms, and sister chromatid aligment is not obligatory along chromosome arms. Thus, the high frequency of chromatid exchanges at homologous positions after mutagen treatment needs another explanation than regular somatic pairing of homologues (possibly an active search of damaged sites for homology). For sister chromatid exchanges a continuous sister chromatid alignment is not required. For correct segregation, permanent alignment of sister centromeres is sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17522894     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-007-0242-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   2.980


  58 in total

1.  Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms.

Authors:  T Tanaka; M P Cosma; K Wirth; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Visualizing chromosome structure/organization.

Authors:  Eric Lam; Naohiro Kato; Koichi Watanabe
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Highly repeated DNA sequence limited to knob heterochromatin in maize.

Authors:  W J Peacock; E S Dennis; M M Rhoades; A J Pryor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular characterization of a maize B chromosome centric sequence.

Authors:  M R Alfenito; J A Birchler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Cloning and characterisation of polymorphic heterochromatic segments of Brachycome dichromosomatica.

Authors:  A Houben; G Wanner; L Hanson; D Verlin; C R Leach; J N Timmis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Shugoshin protects cohesin complexes at centromeres.

Authors:  Yoshinori Watanabe; Tomoya S Kitajima
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Chromosome associations in budding yeast caused by integrated tandemly repeated transgenes.

Authors:  Jörg Fuchs; Alexander Lorenz; Josef Loidl
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Different distributions of homologous chromosomes in adult human Sertoli cells and in lymphocytes signify nuclear differentiation.

Authors:  A C Chandley; R M Speed; A R Leitch
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast.

Authors:  V Guacci; E Hogan; D Koshland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

1.  Similar rye A and B chromosome organization in meristematic and differentiated interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Hisashi Tsujimoto; Takashi Ryu Endo; Andreas Houben
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Interphase chromatin organisation in Arabidopsis nuclei: constraints versus randomness.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Alexandre Berr; Armin Meister
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Spatial relationship between chromosomal domains in diploid and autotetraploid Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei.

Authors:  H Sas-Nowosielska; T Bernas
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.197

4.  Out-of-position telomeres in meiotic leptotene appear responsible for chiasmate pairing in an inversion heterozygote in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Katerina Pernickova; Gabriella Linc; Eszter Gaal; David Kopecky; Olga Samajova; Adam J Lukaszewski
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Cohesin gene defects may impair sister chromatid alignment and genome stability in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Andrea Weissleder; Hoda Ali; Jörg Fuchs; Inna Lermontova; Armin Meister; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  The STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES 5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid alignment and homologous recombination after DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Koichi Watanabe; Michael Pacher; Stefanie Dukowic; Veit Schubert; Holger Puchta; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Arabidopsis sister chromatids often show complete alignment or separation along a 1.2-Mb euchromatic region but no cohesion "hot spots".

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Young-Min Kim; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Chromosome segregation in plant meiosis.

Authors:  Linda Zamariola; Choon Lin Tiang; Nico De Storme; Wojtek Pawlowski; Danny Geelen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  The MCM-binding protein ETG1 aids sister chromatid cohesion required for postreplicative homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Mauricio Quimbaya; Veit Schubert; Tim Lammens; Klaas Vandepoele; Ingo Schubert; Minami Matsui; Dirk Inzé; Geert Berx; Lieven De Veylder
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Supernumerary B Chromosomes and Plant Genome Changes: A Snapshot of Wild Populations of Aegilops speltoides Tausch (Poaceae, Triticeae).

Authors:  Imad Shams; Olga Raskina
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.