Literature DB >> 20123974

Roles of Hop1 and Mek1 in meiotic chromosome pairing and recombination partner choice in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Vitaly Latypov1, Maja Rothenberg, Alexander Lorenz, Guillaume Octobre, Ortansa Csutak, Elisabeth Lehmann, Josef Loidl, Jürg Kohli.   

Abstract

Synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins Hop1 and Mek1 have been proposed to promote homologous recombination in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by establishment of a barrier against sister chromatid recombination. Therefore, it is interesting to know whether the homologous proteins play a similar role in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Unequal sister chromatid recombination (USCR) was found to be increased in hop1 and mek1 single and double deletion mutants in assays for intrachromosomal recombination (ICR). Meiotic intergenic (crossover) and intragenic (conversion) recombination between homologous chromosomes was reduced. Double-strand break (DSB) levels were also lowered. Notably, deletion of hop1 restored DSB repair in rad50S meiosis. This may indicate altered DSB repair kinetics in hop1 and mek1 deletion strains. A hypothesis is advanced proposing transient inhibition of DSB processing by Hop1 and Mek1 and thus providing more time for repair by interaction with the homologous chromosome. Loss of Hop1 and Mek1 would then result in faster repair and more interaction with the sister chromatid. Thus, in S. pombe meiosis, where an excess of sister Holliday junction over homologous Holliday junction formation has been demonstrated, Hop1 and Mek1 possibly enhance homolog interactions to ensure wild-type level of crossover formation rather than inhibiting sister chromatid interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20123974      PMCID: PMC2838064          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00919-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  70 in total

1.  Telomere-led bouquet formation facilitates homologous chromosome pairing and restricts ectopic interaction in fission yeast meiosis.

Authors:  O Niwa; M Shimanuki; F Miki
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-17       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Genetic control of cell size at cell division in yeast.

Authors:  P Nurse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.

Authors:  Scott L Page; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cohesins are required for meiotic DNA breakage and recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Chad Ellermeier; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes.

Authors:  D Lydall; Y Nikolsky; D K Bishop; T Weinert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes.

Authors:  A V Smith; G S Roeder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-03-10       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway.

Authors:  D K Bishop; Y Nikolski; J Oshiro; J Chon; M Shinohara; X Chen
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex.

Authors:  L Xu; B M Weiner; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Unusual nuclear structures in meiotic prophase of fission yeast: a cytological analysis.

Authors:  J Bähler; T Wyler; J Loidl; J Kohli
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  A non-sister act: recombination template choice during meiosis.

Authors:  Neil Humphryes; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The template choice decision in meiosis: is the sister important?

Authors:  Mónica Pradillo; Juan L Santos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  The DNA Damage Checkpoint Eliminates Mouse Oocytes with Chromosome Synapsis Failure.

Authors:  Vera D Rinaldi; Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; Hiroshi Kogo; Hiroki Kurahashi; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Functional interactions among members of the meiotic initiation complex in fission yeast.

Authors:  Silvia Steiner; Jürg Kohli; Katja Ludin
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 7.  Distributing meiotic crossovers for optimal fertility and evolution.

Authors:  Mridula Nambiar; Yu-Chien Chuang; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

8.  Crossover invariance determined by partner choice for meiotic DNA break repair.

Authors:  Randy W Hyppa; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The Mek1 phosphorylation cascade plays a role in meiotic recombination of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Takahiro Tougan; Takashi Kasama; Ayami Ohtaka; Daisuke Okuzaki; Takamune T Saito; Paul Russell; Hiroshi Nojima
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Keun P Kim; Beth M Weiner; Liangran Zhang; Amy Jordan; Job Dekker; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.