Literature DB >> 12851828

Error bands for the linear-quadratic dose-effect relation.

A M Kellerer1.   

Abstract

Least square or maximum likelihood fits to the linear-quadratic dose-effect relation are common in experimental radiobiology and in radio-epidemiology. The fit procedure provides the estimates of the linear and the quadratic dose coefficients, a and b, as well as their standard errors, s(a) and s(b). The magnitude of the standard errors s(a) and s(b) is partly determined by the fact that-for a given data set-different parameter combinations (a, b) can produce rather similar fits, i.e. larger values of a can be roughly compensated by smaller values of b. The values s(a) and s(b) are, because of this interrelation, unsuitable to determine error bands of the dose-effect relation. The exact analysis accounts for the co-variance of the parameters, but it is rarely employed. To avoid the consideration of co-variances a simple parameter change is introduced here that replaces the dose-squared coefficient, b, by a+ bDelta. This term is the effect-to-dose ratio at the reference dose Delta, and can thus be termed reference slope. With the proper value of Delta-which is readily determined for a data set, and is 2 Gy for the dicentric chromosome data which are used as example-the two parameters initial slope, a, and reference slope are then orthogonal, i.e. there is no inter-dependence of the parameter values, and their uncertainties can be treated as independent. In the case of three-model parameters, e.g. the linear-quadratic model with an intercept term, c, the same type of parameter change can be applied to make both the first and the third parameter orthogonal to a. The curve fit is then performed conveniently with the standard computer routines, and parameter uncertainties are obtained that provide by simple error propagation the equations for the standard error or confidence bands of the dose-effect relation. Appendix A gives the numerical scheme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851828     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-003-0195-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  7 in total

1.  Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.

Authors:  M S Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  On the statistical evaluation of dose-response functions.

Authors:  A M Kellerer; J Brenot
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1974-03-29       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Quantitative analysis of the chromosome damage at first division of human lymphocytes after 60CO gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  M Bauchinger; E Schmid; S Streng; J Dresp
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  The effect of 220 kVp X-rays with different spectra on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Schmid; M Bauchinger; S Streng; U Nahrstedt
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Statistical methods in regression and calibration analysis of chromosome aberration data.

Authors:  W Merkle
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Radiation induced chromosome aberrations and the Poisson distribution.

Authors:  A A Edwards; D C Lloyd; R J Purrott
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1979-04-30       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Risk coefficient for gamma-rays with regard to solid cancer.

Authors:  Albrecht M Kellerer; Linda Walsh; Elke A Nekolla
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.925

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells.

Authors:  W Göggelmann; C Jacobsen; W Panzer; L Walsh; H Roos; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Is there reliable experimental evidence for different dicentric yields in human lymphocytes produced by mammography X-rays free-in-air and within a phantom?

Authors:  L Büermann; M Krumrey; M Haney; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  RBE of quasi-monoenergetic 60 MeV neutron radiation for induction of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  R Nolte; K-H Mühlbradt; J P Meulders; G Stephan; M Haney; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Dose-response relationship of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes obtained for the fission neutron therapy facility MEDAPP at the research reactor FRM II.

Authors:  E Schmid; F M Wagner; H Romm; L Walsh; H Roos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Werner Rühm; Albrecht M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 1.925

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.