Literature DB >> 23659923

Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

G Manning1, K Rothkamm.   

Abstract

Diagnostic and therapeutic radiation technology has developed dramatically in recent years, and its use has increased significantly, bringing clinical benefit. The use of diagnostic radiology has become widespread in modern society, particularly in paediatrics where the clinical benefit needs to be balanced with the risk of leukaemia and brain cancer increasing after exposure to low doses of radiation. With improving long-term survival rates of radiotherapy patients and the ever-increasing use of diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures, concern has risen over the long-term risks and side effects from such treatments. Biomarker development in radiology and radiotherapy has progressed significantly in recent years to investigate the effects of such use and optimise treatment. Recent biomarker development has focused on improving the limitations of established techniques by the use of automation, increasing sensitivity and developing novel biomarkers capable of quicker results. The effect of low-dose exposure (0-100 mGy) used in radiology, which is increasingly linked to cancer incidences, is being investigated, as some recent research challenges the linear-no-threshold model. Radiotherapy biomarkers are focused on identifying radiosensitive patients, determining the treatment-associated risk and allowing for a tailored and more successful treatment of cancer patients. For biomarkers in any of these areas to be successfully developed, stringent criteria must be applied in techniques and analysis of data to reduce variation among reports and allow data sets to be accurately compared. Newly developed biomarkers can then be used in combination with the established techniques to better understand and quantify the individual biological response to exposures associated with radiology tests and to personalise treatment plans for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659923      PMCID: PMC3700735          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  109 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Radiosensitization by nitric oxide at low radiation doses.

Authors:  Peter Wardman; Kai Rothkamm; Lisa K Folkes; Michael Woodcock; Peter J Johnston
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Chemical radiosensitizers for use in radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Wardman
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  gamma-H2AX foci formation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of tumor patients after local radiotherapy to different sites of the body: dependence on the dose-distribution, irradiated site and time from start of treatment.

Authors:  Ali Sak; Sara Grehl; Patricia Erichsen; Marianne Engelhard; Andreas Grannass; Sabine Levegrün; Christoph Pöttgen; Michael Groneberg; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Harry Cullings; Akihiko Suyama; Sachiyo Funamoto; Nobuo Nishi; Midori Soda; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kazunori Kodama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Roy E Shore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance.

Authors:  Norman Chan; Marianne Koritzinsky; Helen Zhao; Ranjit Bindra; Peter M Glazer; Simon Powell; Abdellah Belmaaza; Brad Wouters; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Retrospective biodosimetry among United States radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Dale L Preston; Michele Morin Doody; Michael Hauptmann; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Dayton Petibone; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Andre Bouville; Lee C Yong; D Michal Freedman; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Martha S Linet; Alan A Edwards; James D Tucker; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns Of Care Study analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Movsas; Jennifer Moughan; Jean Owen; Lawrence R Coia; Michael J Zelefsky; Gerald Hanks; J Frank Wilson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Gene expression signatures that predict radiation exposure in mice and humans.

Authors:  Holly K Dressman; Garrett G Muramoto; Nelson J Chao; Sarah Meadows; Dawn Marshall; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Joseph R Nevins; John P Chute
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Gene expression signatures of radiation response are specific, durable and accurate in mice and humans.

Authors:  Sarah K Meadows; Holly K Dressman; Garrett G Muramoto; Heather Himburg; Alice Salter; ZhengZheng Wei; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Geoff Ginsburg; Nelson J Chao; Joseph R Nevins; John P Chute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Copper-64 labeled liposomes for imaging bone marrow.

Authors:  Sang-Gyu Lee; Kishore Gangangari; Teja Muralidhar Kalidindi; Blesida Punzalan; Steven M Larson; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 3.  New therapeutic insights into radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  Cheng-Xu Ma; Xin-Ke Zhao; Ying-Dong Li
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Prognostic value of the micronucleus assay for clinical endpoints in neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Beißbarth; Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Leif Hendrik Dröge; Steffen Hennies; Stephan Lorenzen; Lena-Christin Conradi; Henriette Quack; Torsten Liersch; Christian Helms; Miriam Alice Frank; Markus Anton Schirmer; Margret Rave-Fränk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Increased apoptosis and DNA double-strand breaks in the embryonic mouse brain in response to very low-dose X-rays but not 50 Hz magnetic fields.

Authors:  Shreya Saha; Lisa Woodbine; Jackie Haines; Margaret Coster; Nicole Ricket; Lara Barazzuol; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Zenon Sienkiewicz; Penny Jeggo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.