Literature DB >> 19290536

Relative biological effectiveness of 25 and 10 kV X-rays for the induction of chromosomal aberrations in two human mammary epithelial cell lines.

Elke Beyreuther1, Wolfgang Dörr, Anna Lehnert, Elisabeth Lessmann, Jörg Pawelke.   

Abstract

Administration of ionizing radiation for diagnostic purposes can be associated with a risk for the induction of tumors. Therefore, particularly with regard to general screening programs, e.g. with mammography, cost-benefit considerations must be discussed including risk estimation depending upon the radiation quality administered. The present study was initiated to investigate the in vitro X-ray energy dependence for the induction of chromosomal aberrations in the two mammary epithelial cell lines, 184A1 and MCF-12A. The induced excess fragments, dicentric chromosomes and centric rings were analyzed and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was determined for 10 and 25 kV X-rays relative to 200 kV X-rays. The assumed energy dependence with higher values for 10 kV X-rays was confirmed for the excess fragments, with RBE(M) values of 1.92 +/- 0.26 and 1.40 +/- 0.12 for 10 kV X-rays and 1.17 +/- 0.12 and 0.97 +/- 0.10 for 25 kV photons determined for cell lines 184A1 and MCF-12A, respectively. Meaningful results for the induction of dicentric chromosomes and centric rings were obtained only for higher doses with RBE values of 1.31 +/- 0.21 and 1.70 +/- 0.29 for 184A1 and 1.08 +/- 0.08 and 1.43 +/- 0.12 for MCF-12A irradiated with 25 and 10 kV X-rays, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19290536     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-009-0221-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  21 in total

1.  Induction of micronuclei in human fibroblasts and keratinocytes by 25 kV x-rays.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Kathrin Spekl; Anna Panteleeva; Katarina Brankovic; Cordelia Hoinkis; Wolfgang Dörr
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Dicentric chromosomes in monolayers of human lymphocytes produced by monochromatized synchrotron radiation with photon energies from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV.

Authors:  M Krumrey; G Ulm; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2003

4.  Effective dose of A-bomb radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki as assessed by chromosomal effectiveness of spectrum energy photons and neutrons.

Authors:  M S Sasaki; S Endo; Y Ejima; I Saito; K Okamura; Y Oka; M Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  RBE of 25 kV X-rays for the survival and induction of micronuclei in the human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-12A.

Authors:  Anna Lehnert; Elisabeth Lessmann; Jörg Pawelke; Wolfgang Dörr
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  RBE of X rays of different energies: a cytogenetic evaluation by FISH.

Authors:  M Mestres; M R Caballín; L Barrios; M Ribas; J F Barquinero
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by 5.4 keV x-rays.

Authors:  H Roos; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Detection of chromosomal aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the first three postirradiation divisions of human lymphocytes.

Authors:  J J Boei; S Vermeulen; A T Natarajan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-01-17       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  The effect of 29 kV X rays on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Schmid; D Regulla; H-M Kramer; D Harder
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Serum-free growth of human mammary epithelial cells: rapid clonal growth in defined medium and extended serial passage with pituitary extract.

Authors:  S L Hammond; R G Ham; M R Stampfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  FISH-based analysis of 10- and 25-kV soft X-ray-induced DNA damage in 184A1 human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E Beyreuther; W Dörr; A Lehnert; E Lessmann; J Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  DNA double strand breaks induced by low dose mammography X-rays in breast tissue: A pilot study.

Authors:  Julie Depuydt; Tanguy Viaene; Phillip Blondeel; Nathalie Roche; Rudy Van den Broecke; Hubert Thierens; Anne Vral
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Unstable chromosome aberrations do not accumulate in normal human fibroblast after fractionated x-irradiation.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Ojima; Maki Ito; Keiji Suzuki; Michiaki Kai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modelling the radiobiological effect of intraoperative X-ray brachytherapy for breast cancer using an air-filled spherical applicator.

Authors:  Kris Armoogum; Simon Evans; David Morgan
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-08-16

5.  Dosimetric evaluation of incorporating the revised V4.0 calibration protocol for breast intraoperative radiotherapy with the INTRABEAM system.

Authors:  Mubin Y Shaikh; Jay Burmeister; Robin Scott; Lalith K Kumaraswamy; Adrian Nalichowski; Michael C Joiner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.