Literature DB >> 22198086

FISH-based analysis of 10- and 25-kV soft X-ray-induced DNA damage in 184A1 human mammary epithelial cells.

E Beyreuther1, W Dörr, A Lehnert, E Lessmann, J Pawelke.   

Abstract

Over the past years, several in vitro studies have been performed on DNA damage induced by soft X-rays, especially in the energy range below 50 keV. Radiation effects originating from such low-energy photons are relevant in the context of medical diagnostics, for example, mammography, or of accidental exposure to scattered radiation. The present study was initiated to investigate the X-ray energy-dependent induction of stable and unstable chromosomal aberrations in the human mammary epithelial cell line 184A1. Three colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation was applied to identify chromosomal damage in chromosomes 1, 8 and 17, induced by 10-kV or 25-kV soft X-rays as well as by 200-kV X-rays as a reference quality. The overall results confirm the X-ray energy dependencies published for human lymphocytes showing increasing chromosomal aberration frequencies and higher aberration complexity with decreasing X-ray energy and increasing dose. Comparing the obtained dose dependencies, ratios of 0.84 ± 0.09 and 1.22 ± 0.18 were revealed for stable translocations induced by 25- and 10-kV X-rays, respectively, using 200-kV X-rays as reference. Moreover, the analysis of the minimum number of breaks required to form the visible chromosomal damage resulted in similar ratios of 0.93 ± 0.07 for 25-kV X-rays and 1.25 ± 0.10 for 10-kV X-rays relative to 200-kV X-rays. In addition, non-DNA-proportional contributions of chromosomes 8 and 17 to the whole DNA damage and deviations from the expected 1:1 ratio of translocations and dicentrics were observed for cell line 184A1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198086     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0396-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  38 in total

1.  Comparison of X-ray dose-response curves obtained by chromosome painting using conventional and PAINT nomenclatures.

Authors:  J F Barquinero; S Cigarrán; M R Caballín; H Braselmann; M Ribas; J Egozcue; L Barrios
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Dicentric chromosomes in monolayers of human lymphocytes produced by monochromatized synchrotron radiation with photon energies from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV.

Authors:  M Krumrey; G Ulm; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Nomenclature systems for FISH-painted chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  J R Savage; J D Tucker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Differences in the yields of dicentrics and reciprocal translocations observed in the chromosomes of irradiated human skin fibroblasts and blood lymphocytes from the same healthy individuals.

Authors:  P Virsik-Peuckert; M Rave-Fränk; U Langebrake; H Schmidberger
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  The effect of 29 kV X rays on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Schmid; D Regulla; H-M Kramer; D Harder
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Human mammary epithelial cells exhibit a differential p53-mediated response following exposure to ionizing radiation or UV light.

Authors:  K M Meyer; S M Hess; T D Tlsty; S A Leadon
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Culture models of human mammary epithelial cell transformation.

Authors:  M R Stampfer; P Yaswen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 8.  The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance.

Authors:  Tom Misteli; Evi Soutoglou
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Genetic susceptibility for breast cancer: how many more genes to be found?

Authors:  R A Oldenburg; H Meijers-Heijboer; C J Cornelisse; P Devilee
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Monitoring translocations by M-FISH and three-color FISH painting techniques: a study of two radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  F Pouzoulet; S Roch-Lefèvre; A L Giraudet; A Vaurijoux; Pa Voisin; V Buard; M Delbos; J Bourhis; Ph Voisin; Laurence Roy
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  2 in total

1.  DNA Dosimeter Measurement of Relative Biological Effectiveness for 160 kVp and 6 MV X Rays.

Authors:  Xiaolei Li; Kristen Alycia McConnell; Jun Che; Chul Soo Ha; Sang Eun Lee; Neil Kirby; Eun Yong Shim
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Unstable chromosome aberrations do not accumulate in normal human fibroblast after fractionated x-irradiation.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Ojima; Maki Ito; Keiji Suzuki; Michiaki Kai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.