Literature DB >> 9450373

Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system.

B C Moore1, A J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Input-output functions on the basilar membrane of the cochlea show a strong compressive nonlinearity at midrange levels for frequencies close to the characteristic frequency of a given place. This article shows how many different phenomena can be explained as consequences of this nonlinearity, including the "excess" masking produced when 2 nonsimultaneous maskers are combined, the nonlinear growth of forward masking with masker level, the influence of component phase on the effectiveness of complex forward maskers, changes in the ability to detect increments and decrements with level, temporal integration, and the influence of component phase and level on the perception of vowellike sounds. Cochlear hearing loss causes basilar-membrane responses to become more linear. This can account for loudness recruitment, linear additivity of nonsimultaneous masking, linear growth of forward masking, reduced temporal resolution for sounds with fluctuating envelopes, and reduced temporal integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9450373     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  13 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

4.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

5.  Neural coding of sound envelope in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Michaël C C Slama; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.

Authors:  Craig Formby; JoAnne Payne; Xin Yang; Delphanie Wu; Jason M Parton
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

7.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Psychophysical evidence of damaged active processing mechanisms in Belgian Waterslager Canaries.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Robert J Dooling; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.