Literature DB >> 9566323

Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness.

R S Schlauch1, J J DiGiovanni, D T Ries.   

Abstract

Loudness matching functions for tones for persons with one shifted-threshold ear (hearing loss and noise-shifted thresholds) and one ear within normal limits were used to derive the presumed basilar membrane (BM) input-output (I/O) function in a normal ear. The comparison was made by assuming that the BM I/O function for the ear with the cochlear threshold shift has a slope of one (a linearized cochlea). The function for the normal ear was derived from the loudness matching function based on this assumption. Comparisons were made for archival basilar membrane data [M. A. Ruggero, N. C. Rich, A. Recio, S. S. Narayan, and L. Robles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 2151-2163 (1997)] for chinchilla and archival loudness matches for long-duration tones for persons with various degrees of cochlear hearing loss [F. Miskolczy-Fodor, J. Acoust Soc. Am. 32, 486-492 (1960)]. Comparisons were made also between BM I/O functions and ones derived from loudness matches for persons with unilateral hearing loss simulated by broadband noise. The results show a close resemblance between the basilar membrane I/O function and the function derived from loudness matches for long-duration tones, even though the comparison was between human and chinchilla data. As the degree of threshold shift increases from 40 to 80 dB, the derived BM I/O functions become shallower, with slopes for losses of 60 dB or more falling in the range of values reported for physiological data. Additional measures with short-duration tones in noise show that the slope of the loudness function and the slope of the derived basilar membrane I/O function are associated with the behavioral threshold for the tone. The results for long-duration tones suggest a correspondence between BM displacement and loudness perception in cases of recruitment, but the relation between the degree of loss and the amount of BM compression and the relation between signal duration and compression suggests that other factors, such as the neural population response, may play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566323     DOI: 10.1121/1.421379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

5.  Sound representation methods for spectro-temporal receptive field estimation.

Authors:  Patrick Gill; Junli Zhang; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

7.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.