Literature DB >> 14521649

Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women. A conceptual model.

Catherine Kim1, Timothy P Hofer, Eve A Kerr.   

Abstract

Screening and treatment rates for dyslipidemia in populations at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are inappropriately low and rates among women may be lower than among men. We conducted a review of the literature for possible explanations of these observed gender differences and categorized the evidence in terms of a conceptual model that we describe. Factors related to physicians' attitudes and knowledge, the patient's priorities and characteristics, and the health care systems in which they interact are all likely to play important roles in determining screening rates, but are not well understood. Research and interventions that simultaneously consider the influence of patient, clinician, and health system factors, and particularly research that focuses on modifiable mechanisms, will help us understand the causes of the observed gender differences and lead to improvements in cholesterol screening and management in high-risk women. For example, patient and physician preferences for lipid and other CVD risk factor management have not been well studied, particularly in relation to other gender-specific screening issues, costs of therapy, and by degree of CVD risk; better understanding of how available health plan benefits interact with these preferences could lead to structural changes in benefits that might improve screening and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14521649      PMCID: PMC1494935          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20910.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  126 in total

1.  Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; J H Gurwitz; S B Soumerai
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Surveillance for use of preventive health-care services by older adults, 1995-1997.

Authors:  G R Janes; D K Blackman; J C Bolen; L A Kamimoto; L Rhodes; L S Caplan; M R Nadel; S L Tomar; J F Lando; S M Greby; J A Singleton; R A Strikas; K G Wooten
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1999-12-17

3.  An evaluation of statewide strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse.

Authors:  A G Mainous; W J Hueston; M M Love; M E Evans; R Finger
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Diabetes managed care and clinical outcomes: the Harbor City, California Kaiser Permanente diabetes care system.

Authors:  E S Domurat
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle; N Crown; A Meal; A Wynn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

6.  Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record.

Authors:  T R Dresselhaus; J W Peabody; M Lee; M M Wang; J Luck
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care?

Authors:  R Raine
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2000-10

8.  Age, sex and practice variations in the use of statins in general practice in England and Wales.

Authors:  A Majeed; K Moser; R Maxwell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-09

9.  Racial and ethnic differences in health care access and health outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M I Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Potential for cholesterol lowering in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in europe: findings from EUROASPIRE study. European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events.

Authors:  D Vanuzzo; L Pilotto; G B Ambrosio; K Pyörälä; S Lehto; D De Bacquer; G De Backer; D Wood
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.162

View more
  10 in total

1.  Quality of cardiovascular disease preventive care and physician/practice characteristics.

Authors:  Allison H Christian; Thomas Mills; Susan Lee Simpson; Lori Mosca
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A taxonomy of reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended medications for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Sneha Patil; Priya Kamat; Carolyn Peterson; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2010-12

3.  Translating cholesterol guidelines into primary care practice: a multimodal cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Charles B Eaton; Donna R Parker; Jeffrey Borkan; Jerome McMurray; Mary B Roberts; Bing Lu; Roberta Goldman; David K Ahern
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Goal attainments and their discrepancies for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apo B) in over 2,000 Chinese patients with known coronary artery disease or type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Yong-Ming He; Xiang-Jun Yang; Xin Zhao; Hai-Feng Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04

Review 5.  An Update on Gender Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease Care.

Authors:  Tina Shah; Nicolas Palaskas; Ameera Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Differences in cardiovascular disease risk factor management in primary care by sex of physician and patient.

Authors:  Hava Tabenkin; Charles B Eaton; Mary B Roberts; Donna R Parker; Jerome H McMurray; Jeffrey Borkan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Association between facility characteristics and the process of care delivered to patients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Fasiha Kanwal; Tuyen Hoang; Timothy Chrusciel; Jennifer R Kramer; Hashem B El-Serag; Janet Durfee; Jason A Dominitz; Elizabeth M Yano; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Impact of performance improvement continuing medical education on cardiometabolic risk factor control: the COSEHC initiative.

Authors:  JaNae Joyner; Michael A Moore; Debra R Simmons; Brian Forrest; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; Ron Piccione; Kirt Caton; Daniel T Lackland; Carlos M Ferrario
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Response by sex to statin plus ezetimibe or statin monotherapy: a pooled analysis of 22,231 hyperlipidemic patients.

Authors:  Beth L Abramson; Pascale Benlian; Mary E Hanson; Jianxin Lin; Arvind Shah; Andrew M Tershakovec
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Gender disparities in patient education provided during patient visits with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Rebecca S Hilleary; Sarah M Jabusch; Becky Zheng; Michael R Jiroutek; Charles A Carter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.