Literature DB >> 11184961

Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care?

R Raine1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the evidence for the existence of gender bias (defined as care provided independently of clinical need) in the use of specialist services by critically appraising the literature.
METHODS: A computer-assisted search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar and Social Science Citation Index for English language papers published from 1966 until May 1999. In addition, four journals were handsearched and the reference lists of identified papers were explored. Retrospective studies were only used when there were insufficient prospective studies.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight studies were identified covering five major topics: coronary artery disease; renal transplantation; human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS); mental illness; and other (mainly invasive) procedures. The majority (94) examined coronary artery disease. It appears that men are more likely to undergo non-invasive investigations than women, but that subsequent investigation and treatment shows no clear evidence of gender differences. Men are more likely to undergo renal transplantation and, for those with HIV and AIDS, to receive azidothymidine (zidovudine, AZT) than women. There are some indications that disparities in favour of men also occur for those suffering from cardiac arrhythmias and cerebrovascular disease, and for those undergoing vascular surgery, hip replacement and heart transplantation. In contrast, women are more likely to undergo liver transplantation and cataract surgery. Mental health services may be provided differently for men and women. All these findings are limited by a lack of accurate denominator information and insufficient ability to adjust for prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in health care use can be due to demand factors (e.g. differences in the prevalence and severity of disease or in patient preferences), supply factors (particularly clinical judgement), or both. There is a need to examine these explanations thoroughly for gender inequalities in order to ensure that equity (lack of bias) is achieved. There is also a need for higher quality studies if differences are to be attributed conclusively to bias or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11184961     DOI: 10.1177/135581960000500409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  26 in total

Review 1.  Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

2.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice.

Authors:  R Raine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

Review 3.  A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context.

Authors:  Lale Say; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Sex, quality of care, and outcomes of elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the National Heart Failure Project.

Authors:  Saif S Rathore; JoAnne Micale Foody; Yongfei Wang; Jeph Herrin; Frederick A Masoudi; Edward P Havranek; Diana L Ordin; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex-based disparities in liver transplant rates in the United States.

Authors:  A K Mathur; D E Schaubel; Qi Gong; M K Guidinger; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; C Goldfrad; K Rowan; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R A Raine; N A Black; T J Bowker; D A Wood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently?

Authors:  Markus Bönte; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Johannes Siegrist; Lisa Marceau; Carol Link; Sara Arber; Ann Adams; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 May-Jun

9.  Influence of patient characteristics on doctors' questioning and lifestyle advice for coronary heart disease: a UK/US video experiment.

Authors:  Sara Arber; John McKinlay; Ann Adams; Lisa Marceau; Carol Link; Amy O'Donnell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  Gunilla Risberg; Eva E Johansson; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.