Literature DB >> 11290638

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey.

J Hippisley-Cox1, M Pringle, N Crown, A Meal, A Wynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study differences in treatment for men and women with ischaemic heart disease by using standards defined in England's national service framework for coronary artery disease.
DESIGN: Cross sectional survey using routinely collected data.
SETTING: 18 practices in 18 primary care groups in Trent Region.
SUBJECTS: 5891 men and women aged over 35 years with a diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or prescription for nitrates recorded on computer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Difference in the proportion of men and women with ischaemic heart disease and taking lipid lowering treatment.
RESULTS: Women were less likely than men to have a recording of body mass index (79% (2197/2783) v 82% (2552/3102), P=0.002), smoking (86% (2386) v 89% (2779), P<0.0001), and blood pressure (95% (2643) v 96% (2986), P=0.04). Women were also less likely to have a recording of fasting cholesterol concentration (35% (968) v 50% (1550), P<0.0001) but were more likely to be obese (25% (558/2197) v 20% (514/2552), P<0.0001) and have their most recently recorded blood pressure value over the recommended 140/85 mm Hg (60% (1598/2643) v 52% (1553/2986), P<0.0001). Although a higher proportion of women had a raised serum cholesterol concentration (77% (749/968) v 67% (1043/1550), P<0.0001), men were more likely to take aspirin (76% (2358) v 71% (1979), P<0.0001), have a recorded diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia (13% (418) v 10% (274), P<0.0001), and be prescribed lipid lowering drugs (31% (973) v 21% (596), P<0.0001). These differences remained despite adjustments for the practice where the patient is registered, age, smoking status, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest a systematic bias towards men compared with women in terms of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11290638      PMCID: PMC30561          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Inequalities in access to coronary angiography and revascularisation: the association of deprivation and location of primary care services.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk?

Authors:  E A Vogels; A L Lagro-Janssen; C van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.

Authors:  F G Whitelaw; S L Nevin; R M Milne; R J Taylor; M W Taylor; A H Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice.

Authors:  N C Campbell; J Thain; H G Deans; L D Ritchie; J M Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-09

5.  Women with angina pectoris receive less antiplatelet treatment than men.

Authors:  M L Bouvy; E R Heerdink; O H Klungel; A de Boer; A G Stuurman-Bieze; H G Leufkens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all?

Authors:  F Kee; B Gaffney; S Currie; D O'Reilly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-20

9.  Prevalence of angina as assessed by a survey of prescriptions for nitrates.

Authors:  P J Cannon; P A Connell; I H Stockley; S T Garner; J R Hampton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Hospital investigation of men and women treated for angina.

Authors:  I Spencer; N Unwin; G Pledger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-17
View more
  46 in total

1.  General practice workload implications of the national service framework for coronary heart disease: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

2.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice.

Authors:  R Raine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

3.  Primary care in the United States. Innovations in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

4.  Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Janet Yates; Mike Pringle; Carol Coupland; Vicky Hammersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care.

Authors:  Krish Thiru; Alan Hassey; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-17

6.  Inequalities in access to care for patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Socioeconomic inequalities in indicator scores for diabetes: poor quality or poor measures?

Authors:  P G Shekelle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-17

8.  Prevalence, incidence, primary care burden and medical treatment of angina in Scotland: age, sex and socioeconomic disparities: a population-based study.

Authors:  N F Murphy; C R Simpson; K MacIntyre; F A McAlister; J Chalmers; J J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Gender-based inequalities.

Authors:  Mark Walton; Mark Lambert; Runim Rahman; Ben Seale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Ethnic disparities in coronary heart disease management and pay for performance in the UK.

Authors:  Christopher Millett; Jeremy Gray; Martin Wall; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.