Literature DB >> 24648361

Impact of performance improvement continuing medical education on cardiometabolic risk factor control: the COSEHC initiative.

JaNae Joyner, Michael A Moore, Debra R Simmons, Brian Forrest, Kristina Yu-Isenberg, Ron Piccione, Kirt Caton, Daniel T Lackland, Carlos M Ferrario.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Consortium for Southeastern Hypertension Control (COSEHC) implemented a study to assess benefits of a performance improvement continuing medical education (PI CME) activity focused on cardiometabolic risk factor management in primary care patients.
METHODS: Using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model as the foundation, this PI CME activity aimed at improving practice gaps by integrating evidence-based clinical interventions, physician-patient education, processes of care, performance metrics, and patient outcomes. The PI CME intervention was implemented in a group of South Carolina physician practices, while a comparable physician practice group served as a control. Performance outcomes at 6 months included changes in patients' cardiometabolic risk factor values and control rates from baseline. We also compared changes in diabetic, African American, the elderly (> 65 years), and female patient subpopulations and in patients with uncontrolled risk factors at baseline.
RESULTS: Only women receiving health care by intervention physicians showed a statistical improvement in their cardiometabolic risk factors as evidenced by a -3.0 mg/dL and a -3.5 mg/dL decrease in mean LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol, respectively, and a -7.0 mg/dL decrease in LDL cholesterol among females with uncontrolled baseline LDL cholesterol values. No other statistical differences were found. DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate that our PI CME activity is a useful strategy in assisting physicians to improve their management of cardiometabolic control rates in female patients with abnormal cholesterol control. Other studies that extend across longer PI CME PDSA periods may be needed to demonstrate statistical improvements in overall cardiometabolic treatment goals in men, women, and various subpopulations.
© 2014 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, and the Council on Continuing Medical Education, Association for Hospital Medical Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PI CME; hypertension; lipid disorders; medical education; performance improvement CE; profession-physicians; quality improvement/Six Sigma/TQM

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648361      PMCID: PMC5223775          DOI: 10.1002/chp.21217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  38 in total

Review 1.  Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; H Bryan Brewer; James I Cleeman; Sidney C Smith; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Measuring adherence to practice guidelines for the management of hypertension: an evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica L Milchak; Barry L Carter; Paul A James; Gail Ardery
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes.

Authors:  D Davis
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.210

4.  A randomized controlled trial of CQI teams and academic detailing: can they alter compliance with guidelines?

Authors:  H I Goldberg; E H Wagner; S D Fihn; D P Martin; C R Horowitz; D B Christensen; A D Cheadle; P Diehr; G Simon
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1998-03

5.  Adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Treatment goals in postmenopausal women with heart disease. The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS). The HERS Research Group.

Authors:  H G Schrott; V Bittner; E Vittinghoff; D M Herrington; S Hulley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Apr 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Women show worse control of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors than men: results from the MIND.IT Study Group of the Italian Society of Diabetology.

Authors:  L Franzini; D Ardigò; F Cavalot; R Miccoli; A A Rivellese; M Trovati; I Zavaroni; O Vaccaro
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.222

7.  Improving diabetes care and patient outcomes in skilled-care communities: successes and lessons from a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Patrick J Boyle; Kevin W O'Neil; Carolyn A Berry; Stephanie A Stowell; Sara C Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.

Authors:  Donald E Moore; Joseph S Green; Harry A Gallis
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Improving hypertension control: impact of computer feedback and physician education.

Authors:  J C Dickinson; G A Warshaw; S H Gehlbach; J A Bobula; L H Muhlbaier; G R Parkerson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The medical cost of cardiometabolic risk factor clusters in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan; Holly R Wyatt; James O Hill
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Multidisciplinary Self-Directed Learning Module Improves Knowledge of a Quality Improvement Instrument: The HEART Pathway.

Authors:  Nicholas D Hartman; Erin N Harper; Lauren M Leppert; Brittany M Browning; Kim Askew; David E Manthey; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.095

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.