Literature DB >> 20065275

Differences in cardiovascular disease risk factor management in primary care by sex of physician and patient.

Hava Tabenkin1, Charles B Eaton, Mary B Roberts, Donna R Parker, Jerome H McMurray, Jeffrey Borkan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors based upon the sex of the patient and physician and their interaction in primary care practice.
METHODS: We evaluated CVD risk factor management in 4,195 patients cared for by 39 male and 16 female primary care physicians in 30 practices in southeastern New England.
RESULTS: Many of the sex-based differences in CVD risk factor management on crude analysis are lost once adjusted for confounding factors found at the level of the patient, physician, and practice. In multilevel adjusted analyses, styles of CVD risk factor management differed by the sex of the physician, with more female physicians documenting diet and weight loss counseling for hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-4.40) and obesity (OR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.30-3.51) and more physical activity counseling for obesity (OR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.30-3.18) and diabetes (OR = 6.55; 95% CI, 2.01-21.33). Diabetes management differed by the sex of the patient, with fewer women receiving glucose-lowering medications (OR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72), and aspirin prophylaxis (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.58).
CONCLUSION: Quality of care as measured by patients meeting CVD risk factors treatment goals was similar regardless of the sex of the patient or physician. Selected differences were found in the style of CVD risk factor management by sex of physician and patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065275      PMCID: PMC2807384          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  44 in total

1.  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1994 summary.

Authors:  S M Schappert
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1996-04-10

2.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.

Authors:  R M Mickey; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Sex disparities in treatment of cardiac risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah J Wexler; Richard W Grant; James B Meigs; David M Nathan; Enrico Cagliero
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Hypertension in women: current understanding of gender differences.

Authors:  S N Hayes; S J Taler
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Cardiovascular disease in women with diabetes mellitus: a review.

Authors:  Myriam Z Allende-Vigo
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.705

6.  Changing aspirin use in patients with Type 2 diabetes in the UKPDS.

Authors:  C A Cull; H A W Neil; R R Holman
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Aspirin for primary prevention in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kenneth X Nguyen; Jacqueline S Marinac; Chao Sun
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Gender differences in the practice of adult primary care physicians.

Authors:  Ann K Boulis; Judith A Long
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?

Authors:  N Lurie; J Slater; P McGovern; J Ekstrum; L Quam; K Margolis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; R Harris; S C Kobrin; C S Skinner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  19 in total

1.  In this issue:race, place, and sex matter.

Authors:  John J Frey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  The Role of Physician and Practice Characteristics in the Quality of Diabetes Management in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Riordan; S M McHugh; Clodagh O'Donovan; Mavis N Mtshede; P M Kearney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Practitioner Gender and Quality of Care in Ambulatory Cardiology Practices: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry.

Authors:  Dipti Gupta; Fengming Tang; Frederick A Masoudi; Philip G Jones; Paul S Chan; Stacie L Daugherty
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Cardiovascular risk reduction following diagnosis of diabetes by screening: 1-year results from the ADDITION-Cambridge trial cohort.

Authors:  Morten Charles; Rebecca K Simmons; Kate M Williams; Gojka Roglic; Stephen J Sharp; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Opinions on hypertension care and therapy adherence at the healthcare provider and healthcare system level: a qualitative study in the Hague, Netherlands.

Authors:  Saskia E van Grondelle; Sytske van Bruggen; Judith Meijer; Erik van Duin; Michiel L Bots; Guy Rutten; Hedwig M M Vos; Mattijs E Numans; Rimke C Vos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Does Provider Gender Affect the Quality of Primary Care?

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Amy Farkas; Cecilia Scholcoff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study.

Authors:  José R Banegas; Esther López-García; Jean Dallongeville; Eliseo Guallar; Julian P Halcox; Claudio Borghi; Elvira L Massó-González; Francisco J Jiménez; Joep Perk; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Guy De Backer; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Sex, Prescribing Practices and Guideline Recommended, Blood Pressure, and LDL Cholesterol Targets at Baseline in the BARI 2D Trial.

Authors:  Michelle F Magee; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Jiang Lu; Vera A Bittner; Maria Mori Brooks; Neuza Lopes; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  NHS health checks through general practice: randomised trial of population cardiovascular risk reduction.

Authors:  Thomas Cochrane; Rachel Davey; Zafar Iqbal; Christopher Gidlow; Jagdish Kumar; Ruth Chambers; Yvonne Mawby
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Multimorbidity and blood pressure control in 37 651 hypertensive patients from Danish general practice.

Authors:  Maja S Paulsen; Morten Andersen; Janus L Thomsen; Henrik Schroll; Pia V Larsen; Jesper Lykkegaard; Ib A Jacobsen; Mogens L Larsen; Bo Christensen; Jens Sondergaard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.