Literature DB >> 10622995

Diabetes managed care and clinical outcomes: the Harbor City, California Kaiser Permanente diabetes care system.

E S Domurat1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate diabetes clinical outcomes in a large patient population by comparing results of computer-supported team care to those of usual care. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients enrolled in a diabetes care management program were tracked by a computerized system. Their subsequent healthcare outcomes were compared with those of usual-care patients and those of patients who had been discontinued from being managed in this program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screening rates for glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb), urinary protein, serum lipids, and glycemic and blood pressure control were compared between currently managed and usual-care patients. Hospital days and screening rates in a subset of the currently managed group, long-term managed patients, were compared with those of no longer managed patients.
RESULTS: Screening rates for GHb, urinary protein, and serum lipids were higher in currently managed patients than in usual-care patients. Follow-up of initially elevated GHb in currently managed and usual-care patients showed an overall decrease in both groups. Follow-up of initially elevated blood pressure in currently managed patients showed a decrease in both mean systolic and mean diastolic measurements, while follow-up in usual-care patients showed no change in either mean systolic or mean diastolic measurements. Inpatient utilization for the long-term managed patients decreased between 1995 and 1997 and was lower in 1997 for this group than for no longer managed patients. Screening rates for GHb, urinary protein, and serum lipids were higher in the long-term managed patients than in the no longer managed patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-supported care management by a dedicated team appears to reduce the number of hospitalizations and improve screening rates and glycemic and blood pressure control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10622995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings.

Authors:  C M Renders; G D Valk; S Griffin; E H Wagner; J T Eijk; W J Assendelft
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Review of electronic decision-support tools for diabetes care: a viable option for low- and middle-income countries?

Authors:  Mohammed K Ali; Seema Shah; Nikhil Tandon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 3.  Comparative health systems research among Kaiser Permanente and other integrated delivery systems: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jared Lane K Maeda; Karen M Lee; Michael Horberg
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014-06-09

4.  Video Telehealth Access and Changes in HbA1c Among People With Diabetes.

Authors:  Ilana Graetz; Jie Huang; Emilie R Muelly; Loretta Hsueh; Anjali Gopalan; Mary E Reed
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 6.604

Review 5.  Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women. A conceptual model.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients.

Authors:  Colman S C Fung; Weng Yee Chin; Daisy S K Dai; Ruby L P Kwok; Eva L H Tsui; Yuk Fai Wan; Wendy Wong; Carlos K H Wong; Daniel Y T Fong; Cindy L K Lam
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.