Literature DB >> 14521646

Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching.

Stephen M Salerno1, Jeffrey L Jackson, Patrick G O'Malley.   

Abstract

We performed a pre-post study of the impact of three 90-minute faculty development workshops on written feedback from encounters during an ambulatory internal medicine clerkship. We coded 47 encounters before and 43 after the workshops, involving 9 preceptors and 44 third-year students, using qualitative and semiquantitative methods. Postworkshop, the mean number of feedback statements increased from 2.8 to 3.6 statements (P =.06); specific (P =.04), formative (P =.03), and student skills feedback (P =.01) increased, but attitudinal (P =.13) and corrective feedback did not (P =.41). Brief, interactive, faculty development workshops may refine written feedback, resulting in more formative specific written feedback comments.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14521646      PMCID: PMC1494931          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20739.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  13 in total

1.  Feedback notes: a system for feedback to students and residents. Advanced Education Faculty Development Group.

Authors:  T R Schum; R L Krippendorf
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  The search for effective and efficient ambulatory teaching methods through the literature.

Authors:  C Heidenreich; P Lye; D Simpson; M Lourich
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  In-training evaluation during an internal medicine clerkship.

Authors:  R Hatala; G R Norman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The teacher and learner interactive assessment system (TeLIAS): a new tool to assess teaching behaviors in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Patrick G O'Malley; Stephen M Salerno; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  A five-step "microskills" model of clinical teaching.

Authors:  J O Neher; K C Gordon; B Meyer; N Stevens
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

6.  Improving clinical teaching skills using the parallel process model.

Authors:  M K Marvel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Teaching behaviors in the attending-resident interaction.

Authors:  J K Glenn; J C Reid; J Mahaffy; H Shurtleff
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Feedback in clinical medical education.

Authors:  J Ende
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E S Holmboe; N H Fiebach; L A Galaty; S Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques.

Authors:  M G Hewson; M L Little
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  13 in total

1.  Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Monica Yepes; Frederick Williams; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills.

Authors:  Amy M Knight; Karan A Cole; David E Kern; L Randol Barker; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Cynthia Kay; Wilkins C Jackson; Michael Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Berbano; Robert Browning; Louis Pangaro; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Measuring outcomes of a one-minute preceptor faculty development workshop.

Authors:  Elizabeth Eckstrom; Lou Homer; Judith L Bowen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Exploring Perspectives from Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in the USA on Effective Narrative Evaluation: Results from the CDIM National Survey.

Authors:  Robert Ledford; Alfred Burger; Jeff LaRochelle; Farina Klocksieben; Deborah DeWaay; Kevin E O'Brien
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  Beyond "Read More": An Intervention to Improve Faculty Written Feedback to Learners.

Authors:  Amy B Zelenski; Jessica S Tischendorf; Michael Kessler; Scott Saunders; Melissa M MacDonald; Bennett Vogelman; Laura Zakowski
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

8.  Faculty Underestimate Resident Desire for Constructive Feedback and Overestimate Retaliation.

Authors:  Jed Wolpaw; Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Priyanka Dwivedi; Serkan Toy
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2019-10-01

9.  Teaching feedback to first-year medical students: long-term skill retention and accuracy of student self-assessment.

Authors:  Marieke Kruidering-Hall; Patricia S O'Sullivan; Calvin L Chou
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Work-based assessments: making the transition from participation to engagement.

Authors:  Anand Prakash Swayamprakasam; Ashvina Segaran; Lynne Allery
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2014-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.