Literature DB >> 11520379

Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty a randomized controlled trial.

E S Holmboe1, N H Fiebach, L A Galaty, S Huot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and specificity of written evaluations by faculty attendings of internal medicine residents during inpatient rotations.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Four hospitals: tertiary care university hospital, Veterans' Administration hospital, and two community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight faculty and 157 residents from categorical and primary-care internal medicine residency training programs rotating on inpatient general medicine teams. INTERVENTION: Focused 20-minute educational session on evaluation and feedback, accompanied by 3 by 5 reminder card and diary, given to faculty at the start of their attending month. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) number of written comments from faculty specific to unique, preselected dimensions of competence; 2) number of written comments from faculty describing a specific resident behavior or providing a recommendation; and 3) resident Likert-scale ratings of the quantity and effect of feedback received from faculty. Faculty in the intervention group provided more written comments specific to defined dimensions of competence, a median of three comments per evaluation form versus two in the control group, but when adjusted for clustering by faculty, the difference was not statistically significant (P =.09). Regarding feedback, residents in the intervention group rated the quantity significantly higher (P =.04) and were significantly more likely to make changes in clinical management of patients than residents in the control group (P =.04).
CONCLUSIONS: A brief, focused educational intervention delivered to faculty prior to the start of a ward rotation appears to have a modest effect on faculty behavior for written evaluations and promoted higher quality feedback given to house staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11520379      PMCID: PMC1495246          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

2.  The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.

Authors:  G E Miller
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Improving in-training evaluation programs.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J Gray; J MacFadyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Evaluating evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form.

Authors:  W G Thompson; M Lipkin; D A Gilbert; R A Guzzo; L Roberson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Interrater agreement and predictive validity of faculty ratings of pediatric residents.

Authors:  J K Davis; S Inamdar; R K Stone
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-11

6.  Do ratings on the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form detect differences in clinical competence?

Authors:  R J Haber; A L Avins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Global rating scales in residency education.

Authors:  J D Gray
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence?

Authors:  J E Herbers; G L Noel; G S Cooper; J Harvey; L N Pangaro; M J Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  J J Norcini; L L Blank; G K Arnold; H R Kimball
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S Parker; J L Coulehan; W N Kapoor; F H Brown; M Karpf; G S Levey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of residents: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  T G Cooney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching.

Authors:  Stephen M Salerno; Jeffrey L Jackson; Patrick G O'Malley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Description of a developmental criterion-referenced assessment for promoting competence in internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Andrew Varney; Christine Todd; Susan Hingle; Michael Clark
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

4.  A Faculty Development Program to Reduce Rater Error on Milestone-Based Assessments.

Authors:  Jaya M Raj; Patti M Thorn
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

5.  Milestone Implementation's Impact on Narrative Comments and Perception of Feedback for Internal Medicine Residents: a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Sonja E Raaum; Katie Lappe; Jorie M Colbert-Getz; Caroline K Milne
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Cynthia Kay; Wilkins C Jackson; Michael Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Stephen M Salerno; Patrick G O'Malley; Louis N Pangaro; Gary A Wheeler; Lisa K Moores; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Beyond "Read More": An Intervention to Improve Faculty Written Feedback to Learners.

Authors:  Amy B Zelenski; Jessica S Tischendorf; Michael Kessler; Scott Saunders; Melissa M MacDonald; Bennett Vogelman; Laura Zakowski
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

10.  Successful Implementation of a Direct Observation Program in an Ambulatory Block Rotation.

Authors:  Jeremy Smith; Elizabeth Jacobs; Zhanhai Li; Bennett Vogelman; Yingqi Zhao; David Feldstein
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.