E S Holmboe1, N H Fiebach, L A Galaty, S Huot. 1. Yale University Primary Care Internal Medicine Residency Program, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. eholmboe@msn.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and specificity of written evaluations by faculty attendings of internal medicine residents during inpatient rotations. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Four hospitals: tertiary care university hospital, Veterans' Administration hospital, and two community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight faculty and 157 residents from categorical and primary-care internal medicine residency training programs rotating on inpatient general medicine teams. INTERVENTION: Focused 20-minute educational session on evaluation and feedback, accompanied by 3 by 5 reminder card and diary, given to faculty at the start of their attending month. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) number of written comments from faculty specific to unique, preselected dimensions of competence; 2) number of written comments from faculty describing a specific resident behavior or providing a recommendation; and 3) resident Likert-scale ratings of the quantity and effect of feedback received from faculty. Faculty in the intervention group provided more written comments specific to defined dimensions of competence, a median of three comments per evaluation form versus two in the control group, but when adjusted for clustering by faculty, the difference was not statistically significant (P =.09). Regarding feedback, residents in the intervention group rated the quantity significantly higher (P =.04) and were significantly more likely to make changes in clinical management of patients than residents in the control group (P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: A brief, focused educational intervention delivered to faculty prior to the start of a ward rotation appears to have a modest effect on faculty behavior for written evaluations and promoted higher quality feedback given to house staff.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and specificity of written evaluations by faculty attendings of internal medicine residents during inpatient rotations. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four hospitals: tertiary care university hospital, Veterans' Administration hospital, and two community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight faculty and 157 residents from categorical and primary-care internal medicine residency training programs rotating on inpatient general medicine teams. INTERVENTION: Focused 20-minute educational session on evaluation and feedback, accompanied by 3 by 5 reminder card and diary, given to faculty at the start of their attending month. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) number of written comments from faculty specific to unique, preselected dimensions of competence; 2) number of written comments from faculty describing a specific resident behavior or providing a recommendation; and 3) resident Likert-scale ratings of the quantity and effect of feedback received from faculty. Faculty in the intervention group provided more written comments specific to defined dimensions of competence, a median of three comments per evaluation form versus two in the control group, but when adjusted for clustering by faculty, the difference was not statistically significant (P =.09). Regarding feedback, residents in the intervention group rated the quantity significantly higher (P =.04) and were significantly more likely to make changes in clinical management of patients than residents in the control group (P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: A brief, focused educational intervention delivered to faculty prior to the start of a ward rotation appears to have a modest effect on faculty behavior for written evaluations and promoted higher quality feedback given to house staff.
Authors: F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S Parker; J L Coulehan; W N Kapoor; F H Brown; M Karpf; G S Levey Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1992 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephen M Salerno; Patrick G O'Malley; Louis N Pangaro; Gary A Wheeler; Lisa K Moores; Jeffrey L Jackson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amy B Zelenski; Jessica S Tischendorf; Michael Kessler; Scott Saunders; Melissa M MacDonald; Bennett Vogelman; Laura Zakowski Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2019-08