Literature DB >> 14508634

The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Stefan Pollmann1, Eran Zaidel, D Yves von Cramon.   

Abstract

Letters can be matched by their physical identity (i.e., a-a: same/A-a: different) or by their name (both a-a and A-a: same). The latter, more demanding task has in previous experiments led to an advantage of bilateral over within-hemifield matches, which was not observed in the former. We have investigated the neural basis of this bilateral distribution advantage (BDA) in letter name matching with event-related fMRI. Unilateral, compared to bilateral, name matching led to increased activation in the contralateral fusiform and lateral occipital gyri. This increase went along with an ipsilateral increase of activation in homologous areas. Such a hemispheric resource sharing was not observed for letter shape matching. This pattern of activation shows that letter name matching induces hemispheric resource sharing in visual areas, which occurs when task demands in the hemisphere of input reach a critical level. Activation in anterior cingulate complex and posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex showed a task x visual field interaction with lower activation for bilateral than unilateral name matches but higher activation for bilateral than unilateral shape matches, which fits the interhemispheric transfer demands in these tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14508634     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1551-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks.

Authors:  D H Weissman; M T Banich
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; E Zarahn; O Josephs; R N Henson; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Object-based selection operates on a grouped array of locations.

Authors:  R B O'Grady; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-11

5.  Fiber system linking the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex with the retrosplenial/presubicular region in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  R Morris; D N Pandya; M Petrides
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-05-03       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  R Weidner; S Pollmann; H J Müller; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

9.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective.

Authors:  A Belger; M T Banich
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task?

Authors:  M T Banich; A Belger
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  6 in total

1.  How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage.

Authors:  Suzanne E Welcome; Christine Chiarello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Interhemispheric integration in visual search.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Self-Reported ADHD Symptoms and Interhemispheric Interaction in Adults: A Dimensional Approach.

Authors:  Saleh M H Mohamed; Norbert A Börger; Reint H Geuze; Jaap J van der Meere
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.342

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.