Literature DB >> 18206285

How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage.

Suzanne E Welcome1, Christine Chiarello.   

Abstract

Interaction between the cerebral hemispheres may allow both hemispheres to contribute their processing resources in order to cope efficiently with complex tasks [Banich, M. (1998). The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition, 36, 128-157]. The current study investigated whether the benefits of interhemispheric interaction arise because of top-down knowledge about the task built up over the course of a block of trials or because of the processing demands present in a single trial. Participants performed a less computationally complex physical identity task and a more complex adding task on within-visual field and across-visual field trials. Task differences in interhemispheric interaction were compared between the blocked and mixed conditions to investigate whether frequent task switches altered the pattern of interhemispheric resource recruitment. A similar interaction between task difficulty and trial type (across- or within-visual field presentation) was obtained for both the blocked and mixed conditions. The degree of task-dependency of interhemispheric interaction was not altered in the mixed condition. This finding supports the view that interhemispheric interaction becomes beneficial in response to the processing demands of an individual trial rather than as a result of top-down task knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18206285      PMCID: PMC2486493          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks.

Authors:  D H Weissman; M T Banich
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Interhemispheric interaction in semantic categorization of pictures.

Authors:  M Koivisto
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-01

3.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Practice makes a hemisphere perfect: The advantage of interhemispheric recruitment is eliminated with practice.

Authors:  Daniel Weissman; Rebecca Compton
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2003-10

5.  Interhemispheric resource sharing: decreasing benefits with increasing processing efficiency.

Authors:  Marianne Maertens; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective.

Authors:  A Belger; M T Banich
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory.

Authors:  T S Braver; J D Cohen; L E Nystrom; J Jonides; E E Smith; D C Noll
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing.

Authors:  M T Banich
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task.

Authors:  T Klingberg; B T O'Sullivan; P E Roland
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input.

Authors:  J Liederman; J Merola; S Martinez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  Self-Reported ADHD Symptoms and Interhemispheric Interaction in Adults: A Dimensional Approach.

Authors:  Saleh M H Mohamed; Norbert A Börger; Reint H Geuze; Jaap J van der Meere
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  Differential contributions of dorso-ventral and rostro-caudal prefrontal white matter tracts to cognitive control in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Maren Strenziok; Pamela M Greenwood; Sophia A Santa Cruz; James C Thompson; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The corpus callosum as anatomical marker of intelligence? A critical examination in a large-scale developmental study.

Authors:  René Westerhausen; Charline-Marie Friesen; Darius A Rohani; Stine K Krogsrud; Christian K Tamnes; Jon S Skranes; Asta K Håberg; Anders M Fjell; Kristine B Walhovd
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Transcallosal Inhibition during Motor Imagery: Analysis of a Neural Mass Model.

Authors:  Anna L Mangia; Mauro Ursino; Maurizio Lannocca; Angelo Cappello
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Yutaka Oouchida; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The Vulnerability to Suicidal Behavior is Associated with Reduced Connectivity Strength.

Authors:  Stijn Bijttebier; Karen Caeyenberghs; Hans van den Ameele; Eric Achten; Dan Rujescu; Koen Titeca; Cornelis van Heeringen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.