Literature DB >> 10674797

The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks.

D H Weissman1, M T Banich.   

Abstract

Three experiments were designed to examine whether task complexity determines the degree to which a division of processing across the hemispheres (i.e., across-hemisphere processing) underlies performance when within- and across-hemisphere processing are equally possible. When task complexity was relatively low, performance in a midline condition that allowed for either within- or across-hemispheric processing resembled within-hemisphere performance (Experiments 1 and 2). However, when task complexity was high, performance in a midline condition (Experiments 1 and 2) and a lateralized condition, which also allowed for either within- or across-hemisphere processing (Experiment 3), resembled across-hemisphere performance. Results complement and extend prior work (e.g., M. T. Banich & A. Belger, 1990) by indicating that the degree to which interhemispheric cooperation underlies performance changes with the complexity of the task being performed. This finding suggests that the hemispheres dynamically couple or uncouple their processing as a function of task complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10674797     DOI: 10.1037//0894-4105.14.1.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  36 in total

1.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Behavioral evidence of prolonged interhemispheric transfer time among psychopathic offenders.

Authors:  Kristina D Hiatt; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization.

Authors:  Klaas E Stephan; John C Marshall; Will D Penny; Karl J Friston; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage.

Authors:  Suzanne E Welcome; Christine Chiarello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Relationship between intelligence and the size and composition of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Amanda D Hutchinson; J L Mathias; B L Jacobson; L Ruzic; A N Bond; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of severing the corpus callosum on electrical and BOLD functional connectivity and spontaneous dynamic activity in the rat brain.

Authors:  Matthew E Magnuson; Garth J Thompson; Wen-Ju Pan; Shella D Keilholz
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  A unilateral field advantage for detecting repeated elements.

Authors:  Serena Jenelle Butcher; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

9.  Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Alzheimer's disease as a disconnection syndrome?

Authors:  X Delbeuck; M Van der Linden; F Collette
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.