Literature DB >> 9673995

Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective.

A Belger1, M T Banich.   

Abstract

Because interaction of the cerebral hemispheres has been found to aid task performance under demanding conditions, the present study examined how this effect is moderated by computational complexity, the degree of lateralization for a task, and individual differences in asymmetric hemispheric activation (AHA). Computational complexity was manipulated across tasks either by increasing the number of inputs to be processed or by increasing the number of steps to a decision. Comparison of within- and across-hemisphere trials indicated that the size of the between-hemisphere advantage increased as a function of task complexity, except for a highly lateralized rhyme decision task that can only be performed by the left hemisphere. Measures of individual differences in AHA revealed that when task demands and an individual's AHA both load on the same hemisphere, the ability to divide the processing between the hemispheres is limited. Thus, interhemispheric division of processing improves performance at higher levels of computational complexity only when the required operations can be divided between the hemispheres.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9673995     DOI: 10.1037//0894-4105.12.3.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  18 in total

1.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional connectivity patterns during motor behaviour: the impact of past on present activity.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization.

Authors:  Klaas E Stephan; John C Marshall; Will D Penny; Karl J Friston; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage.

Authors:  Suzanne E Welcome; Christine Chiarello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Interhemispheric interaction expands attentional capacity in an auditory selective attention task.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Marie T Banich; Andrew B Erickson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relationship between intelligence and the size and composition of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Amanda D Hutchinson; J L Mathias; B L Jacobson; L Ruzic; A N Bond; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of severing the corpus callosum on electrical and BOLD functional connectivity and spontaneous dynamic activity in the rat brain.

Authors:  Matthew E Magnuson; Garth J Thompson; Wen-Ju Pan; Shella D Keilholz
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  Interactions between new and pre-existing dynamics in bimanual movement control.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Bilateral recruitment of prefrontal cortex in working memory is associated with task demand but not with age.

Authors:  Melanie S Höller-Wallscheid; Peter Thier; Jörn K Pomper; Axel Lindner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Mechanisms of hemispheric specialization: insights from analyses of connectivity.

Authors:  Klaas Enno Stephan; Gereon R Fink; John C Marshall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.