Literature DB >> 1449650

Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching?

U Castiello1, K M Bennett, Y Paulignan.   

Abstract

Kinematic studies have indicated that when a subject reaches to grasp an object, the movement consists of two primary components: (a) a transport phase whereby the hand is brought towards the object and (b) a grip phase whereby the hand changes shape in anticipation of the grasp. Using a visual perturbation paradigm, we investigated the effect of different grip component strategies upon the transport phase. The distal strategy was determined by the size of the object to be grasped: for the small object (1.5 cm o.d.) subjects naturally adopted a precision grip between the index finger and thumb; for the large object (6 cm o.d.) subjects used a whole hand prehensile grip. During 20% of the reaching trials the perturbation was introduced by unexpectedly changing the object size. The results showed that corrections to the distal program in response to the perturbation were preceded by changes in the deceleration phase of the proximal component. The data supported previous findings of two visuo-motor channels for this prehensile movement but indicated that when unanticipated shifts of only the distal program are required, both channels show modifications.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1449650     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80283-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location.

Authors:  Alice C Roy; Yves Paulignan; Martine Meunier; Driss Boussaoud
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Arzi; Y Rossetti; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping component alterations and limb transport.

Authors:  D Timmann; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of cognitive functions and behavioral context on grasping kinematics.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture.

Authors:  M Saling; S Mescheriakov; E Molokanova; G E Stelmach; M Berger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  E Reghem; L Chèze; Y Coppens; E Pouydebat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The reach to grasp movement of blind subjects.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; C Mucignat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grip type and task goal modify reach-to-grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Stacey L DeJong; Kendra M Cherry; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.