Literature DB >> 20457866

Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Preeti Raghavan1, Marco Santello, Andrew M Gordon, John W Krakauer.   

Abstract

Efficient grasping requires planned and accurate coordination of finger movements to approximate the shape of an object before contact. In healthy subjects, hand shaping is known to occur early in reach under predominantly feedforward control. In patients with hemiparesis after stroke, execution of coordinated digit motion during grasping is impaired as a result of damage to the corticospinal tract. The question addressed here is whether patients with hemiparesis are able to compensate for their execution deficit with a qualitatively different grasp strategy that still allows them to differentiate hand posture to object shape. Subjects grasped a rectangular, concave, and convex object while wearing an instrumented glove. Reach-to-grasp was divided into three phases based on wrist kinematics: reach acceleration (reach onset to peak horizontal wrist velocity), reach deceleration (peak horizontal wrist velocity to reach offset), and grasp (reach offset to lift-off). Patients showed reduced finger abduction, proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion, and metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) extension at object grasp across all three shapes compared with controls; however, they were able to partially differentiate hand posture for the convex and concave shapes using a compensatory strategy that involved increased MCP flexion rather than the PIP flexion seen in controls. Interestingly, shape-specific hand postures did not unfold initially during reach acceleration as seen in controls, but instead evolved later during reach deceleration, which suggests increased reliance on sensory feedback. These results indicate that kinematic analysis can identify and quantify within-limb compensatory motor control strategies after stroke. From a clinical perspective, quantitative study of compensation is important to better understand the process of recovery from brain injury. From a motor control perspective, compensation can be considered a model for how joint redundancy is exploited to accomplish the task goal through redistribution of work across effectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457866      PMCID: PMC2888236          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00936.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of Object Texture on Precontact Movement Time in Human Prehension.

Authors:  T. G. Fikes; R. L. Klatzky; S. J. Lederman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; M F Levin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients.

Authors:  Agnès Roby-Brami; Stéphane Jacobs; Nezha Bennis; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Motor improvements after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats are mediated by compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Gerlinde A Metz; Iwa Antonow-Schlorke; Otto W Witte
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over.

Authors:  J Desrosiers; R Hébert; G Bravo; E Dutil
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Grip aperture scaling to object size in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Stella Maris Michaelsen; Eliane C Magdalon; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.422

10.  Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Marco Santello; Federico Tubaldi; Stefano Massaccesi; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  32 in total

1.  Development of a biomimetic hand exotendon device (BiomHED) for restoration of functional hand movement post-stroke.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Katlin A Landers; Hyung-Soon Park
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Quantifying feedforward control: a linear scaling model for fingertip forces and object weight.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Seda Bilaloglu; Viswanath Aluru; Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  A Short and Distinct Time Window for Recovery of Arm Motor Control Early After Stroke Revealed With a Global Measure of Trajectory Kinematics.

Authors:  Juan C Cortes; Jeff Goldsmith; Michelle D Harran; Jing Xu; Nathan Kim; Heidi M Schambra; Andreas R Luft; Pablo Celnik; John W Krakauer; Tomoko Kitago
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Reciprocal intralimb transfer of skilled isometric force production.

Authors:  Vikram A Rajan; Robert M Hardwick; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Learning redundant motor tasks with and without overlapping dimensions: facilitation and interference effects.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Jon Wieser; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Recovery from ischemia in the middle-aged brain: a nonhuman primate model.

Authors:  Tara L Moore; Ronald J Killiany; Monica A Pessina; Mark B Moss; Seth P Finklestein; Douglas L Rosene
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models?

Authors:  John W Krakauer; S Thomas Carmichael; Dale Corbett; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Temporal structure of variability decreases in upper extremity movements post stroke.

Authors:  Amit Sethi; Tara Patterson; Theresa McGuirk; Carolynn Patten; Lorie G Richards; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rl Sainburg; D Good; A Przybyla
Journal:  J Neurol Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.